> There's of course no better person than Jens, if he's willing to do the job.
> Jens, please indicate your willingness :-)
Yes, consider me willing. :)
Jens
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/lis
I agree and cleaning up the mess is long overdue. The non-commercial clause
certainly makes no sense as you say and LGPL might be problematic when it comes
to re-use of QML code. I got the permissions to move existing headers over to
BSD and will use that for the new ones as well. The required c
Mostly due to historical reasons. The desktop components were originally based
on a concept of styled "custom" components developed in a separate branch on
Gitorious:
https://qt.gitorious.org/qt-components/qt-components/commits/custom
The idea was that you can create a custom component with it's
>
> Yes, I mean if QtQuick2 is designed to reduce memory footprint for
> non-ui applications it makes sense to keep UI components in a separate
> module. I'm just arguing that if the Window module will just contain
> the Window component, it wouldn't worth it to keep this component in a
> separate
