Hi,
On Apr 11, 2012, at 15:09 , ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> For non-QObject classes which *already* have virtual tables, we should
> consider it. Fortunately, those classes are minority in Qt, we have very few
> of them.
grep'ing through the source code, we have several virtual_hooks in Qt:
Hi,
> The difference is that QLatin1String will make an inline call to
> strlen(latin1data), which the compiler may be able to optimise. Then again, we
> could make the same in QString::fromLatin1... any takers?
review?
http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,11530
Harald
_
