Re: [Development] The place of QML

2012-04-24 Thread alan.alpert
>From: development-bounces+alan.alpert=nokia@qt-project.org >[development->bounces+alan.alpert=nokia@qt-project.org] on behalf of ext >d3fault [d3faultdot...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:33 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Developm

Re: [Development] The place of QML

2012-04-24 Thread alan.alpert
>From: ext Girish Ramakrishnan [gir...@forwardbias.in] >Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 12:50 PM >To: Donald Carr >Cc: Alpert Alan (Nokia-MP/Brisbane); development@qt-project.org >Subject: Re: [Development] The place of QML >>> I do think we should evaluate exposing the QML implementations to C++ for

Re: [Development] Moving itemmodels classes to QtCore

2011-11-23 Thread alan.alpert
Bart Cerneels said: >I incorrectly assumed that they were already in QtCore along with >QAIM. I for one am a big fan of using proxymodels with/from QML and >can think of quite a few use-cases. Note that it doesn't have to be in QtCore to use with QML. QtGui would do just as well, but these QAIM c

Re: [Development] Extending QML flickable element

2011-11-21 Thread alan.alpert
flickable extended QML component, you should use Flickable{ //QML code goes here } -- Alan Alpert From: development-bounces+alan.alpert=nokia@qt-project.org [development-bounces+alan.alpert=nokia@qt-project.org] on behalf of ext Sandro Andrade