Re: [Development] Make Qt WebEngine an add-on

2014-07-10 Thread Zeno Albisser
earlier this year and we do have a wiki page here: http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWebEngine We are currently focusing on getting all the desktop platforms (Linux/Mac/Win) up and running. - Zeno -- Zeno Albisser Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt +47 406 03 455 Visit us on: http://qt.digia.com

[Development] Make Qt WebEngine an add-on

2014-06-27 Thread Zeno Albisser
WebEngine as an add-on together with Qt 5.4 Best Regards, - Zeno -- Zeno Albisser Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt +47 406 03 455 Visit us on: http://qt.digia.com ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org

Re: [Development] where to fill bugs about snowshoe and qtwebkitengine?

2014-01-24 Thread Zeno Albisser
Hi, Please just file a bug-report on bugreports.qt-project.org. Make sure to select the correct component. There is currently the components “WebKit” for QtWebKit / QtWebKit2 and there is a separate component “WebEngine” for QtWebEngine related issues. - Zeno On 21 Jan 2014, at 14:06, haithem

Re: [Development] ML for QtWebEngine

2013-10-16 Thread Zeno Albisser
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen < oswald.buddenha...@digia.com> wrote: > did anyone create a sysadmin request? > > I just did this morning. :) ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman

Re: [Development] ML for QtWebEngine

2013-10-15 Thread Zeno Albisser
Once again from the correct address. On Oct 15, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Matt Broadstone wrote: > > Not that I am really interested in debating such a decision, but I'm not > quite sure I see the noise you guys are referring to. I've been signed up to > the webkit-qt ML for some time and it's basical

Re: [Development] ML for QtWebEngine

2013-10-06 Thread Zeno Albisser
Hi, On Oct 4, 2013, at 7:49 PM, Mark wrote: > Would it be an idea to create an mailing list for the "addon modules"? So one > list for all addon devs to gather? I don't think this is an option for QtWebEngine. We are not really an addon now, and we are not planning to become an addon either.

Re: [Development] Nominating Allan Sandfeld as approver

2013-01-17 Thread Zeno Albisser
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Rafael Roquetto wrote: > Have you got a link to his dashboard? > > I don't think the dashboard gives the appropriate view here. Allan has been contributing to qtwebkit for a long time, and his changes are mostly related to qtwebkit. As stated by Simon, he is alread

Re: [Development] Nominating Mitch Curtis for approver

2012-11-30 Thread Zeno Albisser
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote: > I would like to propose Mitch Curtis for approver status. > I am actually quite impressed, how he is continuously hunting down the bugs! Keep up the good spirit! ;) +1 from my side. Zeno ___

Re: [Development] Proposal: Change Qt's Security Policy to Full Disclosure

2012-10-24 Thread Zeno Albisser
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:55 AM, d3fault wrote: > tl;dr: > > How is my keeping up the good work earning trust? Do you guys really > not see the gaping hole in that logic? > I do certainly have problem trusting people that show that much interest in getting access to all vulnerabilities as you d