Hi all,
I might be already almost famous for those reminders :-)
@Maintainers:
I recently went to
https://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt6-6.10/whatsnew610.html
and I saw many sections we are empty at all or have suspiciously short content.
We have beta2 for 6.10 now. Actually, the scope schould be f
omment possible:-(
Best regards
Frank
On Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2025 10:35:16 CET Vladimir Minenko via Development
wrote:
Good morning Qt developers!
Qt is conducting a user survey about Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView. We want to
hear users' feedback to properly align the priorities for the development
Good morning Qt developers!
Qt is conducting a user survey about Qt WebEngine and Qt WebView. We want to
hear users' feedback to properly align the priorities for the development of
these components. We would appreciate your input.
If you use Qt WebEngine or Qt WebView, please take 15–20 minute
Hi Thiago,
I would not take the silence as a sign of consent. I rather have the impression
that there is no sufficient interest in this at the moment. Despite this, there
are quite a few urgent improvements required on the CI. I greatly doubt it will
be possible to have additional configuration
6) when should we do this?
The last time we discussed C++20, it was made clear that we can only do such
changes on LTS+1 releases. That's 6.9.
The last time we discussed this was at QtCS24
(https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2024_C%2B%2B20), where IIRC the conclusion was that
ATM, there is no reason to swit
Hello all,
FYI in this subject:
https://www.qt.io/blog/moving-to-msvc-2022-in-qt-68
--
Vladimir
On 12. Apr 2024, at 14:04, Oliver Wolff via Development
wrote:
Hey hey
On 15/03/2024 16:47, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Monday, 5 February 2024 01:44:29 PDT Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
I was tryi
Hi,
I also think we should first get the 2022 compiler packages available for
installation in parallel to the 2019 ones. This should be available for users
for a while so that they have a transition period. Along with this, we should
announce that the 2019 compiler will be dismissed by a specif
Just as a reminder, the "C++20 is mandatory for users of Qt (Phase III)”
(https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-109362) says "The tentative plan is Qt
6.12+”
and "C++20 is required for the development and buiding of Qt itself (Phase II)”
(https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-109361) - "The ten
Hello team fluentmq,
> We would need you guys to confirm that you'd have the ressource model and the
> benefit to integrate the module to the commercial offer
I do not quite understand who exactly you expect to confirm and what you mean
with "ressource model”.
Despite that, I also think the i
Hello all,
on this occasion, I would like to call the Qt Development community for
conscious and pragmatic decisions when it comes to changes in the "minimum C++
standard”.
For some reason, Qt became known to do these switches on some “surprising"
basis. I recall well as a colleague was leavin
Hi,
I’m sorry to say, but from my perspective, this change cannot be done in 6.6. I
think 6.7 is better. And this is why.
I just had a look at the anonymous telemetry data which is sent from Qt
Creator. There is a setting for this where you can turn it on and off. So the
below numbers cover on
Hello all,
I want to share on this mailing list a proposal for the timeline and phases to
support C++20 with and in Qt. Writing this, I’m aware that there were other
discussions about the support of C++20 on this mailing list. This message is a
step to get a list of features that all Qt users c
12 matches
Mail list logo
