2020-06-17 09:59, Mitch Curtis rašė:
The Qt Quick Calendar module provides a set of types that can be used to build
calendars in Qt Quick.
That's really useful! Especially when QCC1 are removed in Qt6...
Though the biggest question is - will it be available in LGPL form?
Thanks!
Hi list,
I see more and more discussions about Qt6, and though what future will look like for qt-solutions
[0] repo? It has some useful tools like qtservice and qtsingleapplication, though other "solutions"
seems not really updated any more.
Anyhow, I guess it's purely community effort to mak
On 7/5/18 10:54 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Instead of applying a workaround, can we just raise the minimum NDK to one
that fixes the issue? Are there still valid reasons for requiring old NDKs?
I see that there is still work in progress to support Clang, as GCC NDK is being deprecated, if I
un
2017.02.06 18:38, Thiago Macieira rašė:
Yes, but it's very hard to measure. I do agree in shrinking our code however
much we can (which is why I'd like to suppress the unwind tables completely).
Sorry for off-topic, but I wonder, have anyone measured how Qt modules
sizes differs with and with
2017.01.23 13:28, List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development
wrote:
Hi all,
1> Qt 5.8.0 and Qt Creator 4.2.1 releases are out!
Will there be a 5.7.2 release? Thanks.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://li
2016.02.28 19:16, Thiago Macieira rašė:
Though should I add TODO for the future to simplify it when MSVC2013 support
ends? Or it could be like that "forever"?
Not worth it, since there's a lot of code using Q_GLOBAL_STATIC and they often
have more reasons than just thread-safely initialisatio
2016.02.28 17:37, Olivier Goffart rašė:
Since QBasicAtomic is a literal type, it is going to be initialized at compile
time and can be used without mutexes.
That's interesting, thanks.
Though should I add TODO for the future to simplify it when MSVC2013 support ends? Or it
could be like that
Hello,
If Qt 5.7 are going to support only "proper" C++11 compilers, can new Qt code assume that function local static variable
initialization is thread-safe?
Qt 5.7 Wiki page [1] makes me think that only Visual Studio 2013 and above are supported, is that right? If so, it
appears that "magic
