Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Qt 6.10 Feature Freeze

2025-06-04 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, We should have snapshots of Qt 6.11 (dev) available also before the release of Qt 6.10, so as soon as the functionality is ready enough to be tried out that can be done also using Qt 6.11 snapshot. The challenge of course is how to find the ones to try out things in a pre-release as it is n

Re: [Development] Proposing QUIP-23: Qt-Security header in source code files

2024-07-11 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, Yes, exactly that (untrusted input) and especially the parts where this is done by Qt (so that it is not even possible for the app to check etc). There might be some other ones as well, but main idea is to separate those few places where extra good care must be taken from the baseline (whic

Re: [Development] Fwd: Removing Qt 3D from release configuration in dev branch

2024-03-28 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
ped? First was open source LTS support, now Qt3d is on the chopping blocks, so that makes module support uncertain. Due to the combination. With kind regards Björn On Wed, 27 Mar 2024, 09:40 Tuukka Turunen via Development, mailto:development@qt-project.org>> wrote: Hi, We have been discu

Re: [Development] Fwd: Removing Qt 3D from release configuration in dev branch

2024-03-27 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
l be the next thing that gets dropped? First was open source LTS support, now Qt3d is on the chopping blocks, so that makes module support uncertain. Due to the combination. With kind regards Björn On Wed, 27 Mar 2024, 09:40 Tuukka Turunen via Development, mailto:development@qt-project.org>>

Re: [Development] Removing Qt 3D from release configuration in dev branch

2024-03-27 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
From: Development on behalf of Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 at 14:30 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Removing Qt 3D from release configuration in dev branch Hi, On 27/03/2024 09:39, Tuukka Turunen via Development wrote: &

[Development] Removing Qt 3D from release configuration in dev branch

2024-03-27 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, We have been discussing with KDAB about the future maintenance of Qt 3D module. It is a quite large and complex module, which has for most use cases by now been superseded by Qt Quick 3D. Since Qt 3D has been available for a long time, it should continue to be available for those who still

Re: [Development] Decrease amount of qt releases in online installer

2024-02-22 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, For the open-source online installer where mirorbrain is used. The commercial distribution is done with a different system where mirror space is not an issue and there is a much higher number of “mirrors”, so also the archive performance is a bit better. Yours,

Re: [Development] Decrease amount of qt releases in online installer

2024-02-21 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, This is a good change. It has been a long time since we previously cleaned the releases available via the online installer, so the number has been growing to be quite large. In general we should be always guiding users towards the latest releases and to large extent users are doing that. W

[Development] Update What's new in Qt 6.7 (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Qt 6.7 Feature Freeze)

2023-12-15 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, There is quite a lot of things missing still from https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtdoc/+/524057 Qt 6.7 Beta 1 release is somewhere early next week and we should publish the first iteration of the What’s new page along with it. Yours, Tuukka From: Development on

Re: [Development] Requesting a repository for Qt Interface Framework Reference APIs

2023-12-07 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, Thiago is right, we can change the name as the module technically is not part of Qt release (https://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/6.6/6.6.1/submodules/). That said, we can also decide not to change the name. Like mentioned by Dominik, it has existing since a while with the current n

Re: [Development] Meeting minutes from Qt Release Team meeting 20.06.2023

2023-07-04 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, Still on its way, there were a couple of items found during testing and new packages with those fixes needed to be built (and now new test round ongoing). Probably early next week, but anyways as soon as possible. Yours, Tuukka From: Development on behalf of Ilya Fedin

Re: [Development] Raising the minimum to C++20

2023-05-05 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, I also agree that it is important to keep moving along and harness what new C++ versions offer in the best way we can. Potential time to do this would indeed be in the near future – one good point in time to drop support for older compilers could be with Qt 6.9 around March 2025 as mentione

Re: [Development] Proposal: let's change the release schedules a bit

2023-02-06 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, We have not yet concluded about Jani’s proposal for adjusting the feature freeze and release timing: https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2022-December/043380.html The original proposal was: ”… release minor releases in April and October, that would allow us to move FF also a

Re: [Development] New Qt example development guideline and revamping examples

2023-02-03 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
, Tuukka From: Development on behalf of Shawn Rutledge via Development Date: Friday, 3. February 2023 at 15.56 To: Qt Development Subject: Re: [Development] New Qt example development guideline and revamping examples On 3 Feb 2023, at 13:56, Tuukka Turunen via Development wrote: pdf

Re: [Development] New Qt example development guideline and revamping examples

2023-02-03 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, …and in case unsure what is shown in docs & Creator, it is the ones listed in the manifest file as described at https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/26-qdoc-configuration-example-manifest-files.html and https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Examples_in_Qt_Creator Mostly these are examples that have not been deemed rele

Re: [Development] New Qt example development guideline and revamping examples

2023-01-18 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, Yes, intention is to improve also the application / project examples in qtdoc repo. In addition to the Qt 6 best practices, these could also get a bit of visual or functionality polish. Problematic or unnecessary existing examples could be removed. Intention is also to adjust how the exampl

Re: [Development] New Qt example development guideline and revamping examples

2023-01-18 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, Typically pick to 6.5 as the examples like documentation is unproblematic to update. Yours, Tuukka From: Development on behalf of Ivan Solovev via Development Date: Wednesday, 18. January 2023 at 12.09 To: development@qt-project.org , Kimmo Leppälä Subject: Re: [Develo

Re: [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

2022-12-23 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, One more thing to note related to 10.15 support in Qt 6.5 is that even if it is dropped from the supported platforms (as has been planned), it doesn’t mean it would be impossible for someone to use it in their application. Of course, deploying to an unsupported version means more testing an

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

2022-12-19 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
… and like the first line states, the telemetry functionality of Qt Creator is based on https://api.kde.org/frameworks/kuserfeedback/html/index.html On the end user application analytics topic there is work ongoing to build a new product called Qt Insight, but that is currently not for open-sou

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

2022-12-19 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, This mailing list thread is actually already part of the discussion. I am sure the relevant stakeholders will read though the mails. One important thing: the question is whether or not the _latest_ Qt version supports 3 or 4 generations of macOS – because we already support the older macOS

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

2022-12-17 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Dropping the interest list to discuss a bit the macOS virtualization. > you *can* buy server grade Mac systems. They are called Mac Pro and... Apple's standard license agreement allowes to virtualize two macOS instances on macOS. For this level Mac Mini is quite sufficient, better if the ne

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

2022-12-17 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, Most of the macOS users are quite quick to take on new OS versions and this is true also for adoption of macOS versions with the new numbering scheme. Apple hardware is also rather good in keeping support for new OS versions and at least between versions 10.15 and 11 there does not seem to

Re: [Development] Proposal: let's change the release schedules a bit

2022-12-14 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, One of the main problems we face every time with the feature freeze is a lot of changes coming in just before the deadline. While this is quite natural as such, it does also cause some amount of instability and problems in getting the full integration test round completed regularly. There a

Re: [Development] Requesting Feature Freeze exception for CTF tracing backend

2022-12-12 Thread Tuukka Turunen via Development
Hi, It would be good to have these in. Yours, Tuukka Lähettäjä: Development käyttäjän Antti Määttä via Development puolesta Lähetetty: perjantaina, joulukuuta 9, 2022 3:41 ip. Vastaanottaja: development@qt-project.org Aihe: [Development] Requesting Feature F