Re: [Development] Copyright changes

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > I will take you meant "QT_MODULE_TO_TEST=qtdeclarative > qtqa/tests/prebuild/license/tst_licenses.pl" > > Yeah, I used this script earlier, but I did not know it is already > integrated into the CI. Couldn't this be integrated into a bot rathe

Re: [Development] On the reliability of CI

Shawn Rutledge said: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:00:47PM +1000, Rohan McGovern wrote: > > Replying here to some comments on IRC, since I'm rarely online at the > > same time as the others, but I don't want to let all the comments go > > unanswered... > &

[Development] On the reliability of CI

Replying here to some comments on IRC, since I'm rarely online at the same time as the others, but I don't want to let all the comments go unanswered... > steveire> [06:32:44] CI is seriously depresssing. For the last 24 hours > there has been one successful merge. Many of the others are failing >

[Development] Nominating Janne Anttila as Approver

I hereby nominate Janne Anttila as an approver. Janne has a long history with Qt, going back (at least?) to the initial Qt for S60 port in 2008. In the past several years, Janne has contributed many fixes to all platforms (especially, it seems, those platforms which nobody else likes to work on :

[Development] New mailing list, ci-reports

Hi all, Please be aware of this new Qt Project mailing list, ci-reports: http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-reports This list receives automated reports from the Qt Project CI system pertaining to test run passes or failures (essentially the same information posted to gerrit). It

Re: [Development] Issue when setting up the network test server

Sébastien Fricker said: > Hi, > I had a try to follow > http://qt.gitorious.org/qtqa/sysadmin/blobs/master/README.network_test_server.txt > to setup the network test server for the code coverage statistic computation > (http://download.froglogic.com/public/qt5-squishcoco-report/) > > I'm facing

Re: [Development] No recent commit in qt5 git?

Thiago Macieira said: > On quarta-feira, 10 de outubro de 2012 15.01.56, Stephen Chu wrote: > > The last commit in was a week ago. Is > > it frozen for release? > > No. It's blocked on failing tests. Help fix them and it will go in sooner :-) > To elaborate ... y

Re: [Development] Integration system problems

Peter Varga said: > Hi all, > > I've noticed that merging patches into QtDeclarative repository doesn't > really work, see https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,36116 > I suppose that the problem is in the integration system. The build log > of my last attempt says > > HEAD is now at ae9859f

Re: [Development] Code coverage statistics online

Harri Porten said: > Hi! > > We started publishing code coverage results of Qt 5 unit test runs as > produced by our tool Squish Coco: > >http://download.froglogic.com/public/qt5-squishcoco-report/ (results) > > http://download.froglogic.com/public/effectively-testing-qt5-using-squishcoc

Re: [Development] bool QProcess::waitForFinished() Race Condition?

d3fault said: > Unable to confirm the race condition, which is why I'm posting here > instead of filing the bug report. Isn't there a race condition between > calling QProcess::start() and QProcess::waitForFinished()? > > Can't the OS switch contexts at ANY TIME (in this case, between the > start(

[Development] Upcoming CI disruptions

In preparation for the transfer of remaining systems from Nokia to Digia, various projects covered by the Qt CI will soon be migrated from Nokia's Pulse infrastructure to a new Jenkins setup. The migration will begin tomorrow. The first projects to be migrated will be QA-related projects (dogfoodi

Re: [Development] Qt Project CI System : Windows 7 machines with some problems

Sergio Ahumada said: > Hi, > > We've found that Windows 7 machines are not up and running at the moment > so we've decided to disable them from Qt Project CI system until we can > fix them. > > This means that you might need to be a little bit more careful with what > you stage during the week

Re: [Development] Build Qt 5 with MinGW 4.7?

Andreas Holzammer said: > Am 26.08.2012 16:23, schrieb Stephen Chu: > > On 8/26/12 10:03 AM, Stephen Chu wrote: > > > >> > >> Thanks for pointing out the build differences. I didn't realize there > >> are so many different builds of the same MinGW version. Switching to > >> mingw-builds get me fur

Re: [Development] tools/configure with mingw build error

Peter Kümmel said: > On 28.08.2012 21:14, Peter Kümmel wrote: > > On 28.08.2012 20:46, Peter Kümmel wrote: > > But also jom fails, I thought jom could also handle mingw makefiles? > >>> > >>> No, Jom only handles NMake makefiles, afaik. > >>> > >> > >> Checked it again: I could build qt/4

Re: [Development] The containers in the "containers" branch

Oswald Buddenhagen said: > > > For future reference, whoever is bypassing the CI to change the SHA1 of > > a branch should also issue a command like this to update the staging > > branch: > > > > ssh -p 29418 codereview.qt-project.org gerrit staging-rebuild --project > > qt/qtbase --branch con

Re: [Development] The containers in the "containers" branch

Thiago Macieira said: > On quinta-feira, 26 de julho de 2012 13.27.16, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > I'll abandon all changes still open in one week. They're cluttering my > > dashboard. > > Uh... André has approved one commit and tried to stage it, but it failed. > Gerrit claims a conflict. > > S

Re: [Development] Use static qt libraries

Liu Song.7 (Nokia-MP/Beijing) said: > Thanks, are such undefined symbols normal ? And is there a way to fix it ? Right now, the only thing which comes to mind is if you have somehow mixed some -frtti and -fno-rtti objects. > > -Original Message- > From: Mcgovern Rohan (Nokia-MP/Brisbane)

Re: [Development] Use static qt libraries

song.7@nokia.com said: > Hi, > > Now we can build out the single libqt5.so (using ARM toolchain) by: > > "OPTS += -static" to create the static qt libs > "ar -x libQtXX.a" to extract the .o files > "armlink --fpic --shared *.o -o libqt5.so" to generate final single so > > Bu

Re: [Development] Qt Project CI outage on 19th-20th July 2012

Rohan McGovern said: > Hi all, > > Please be advised that tonight/tomorrow the Qt Project CI system > will have a temporary outage for planned maintenance of a site UPS. > > The system will stop accepting new builds at: > > 18:30 UTC, 19th > 20:30 CET, 19th &g

[Development] Qt Project CI outage on 19th-20th July 2012

Hi all, Please be advised that tonight/tomorrow the Qt Project CI system will have a temporary outage for planned maintenance of a site UPS. The system will stop accepting new builds at: 18:30 UTC, 19th 20:30 CET, 19th 04:30 AEST, 20th The outage is estimated to last somewhere from 4-7 ho

Re: [Development] buildsystem branches (about to be) integrated

Peter Kümmel said: > On 26.06.2012 12:28, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:56:15PM +0200, ext Peter Kümmel wrote: > >> Shadow builds [...] are broken: > >> > > fix integrated > > Yes it works now. Thanks! > > Wouldn't this be a test case for the build server? > Yes, cert

Re: [Development] Notes from QtNetwork sessions

shane.kea...@accenture.com said: > > * Autotests > * Non-significant > * Not compiled What is meant by "not compiled"? > * Dependency on the test server > * eg. QNetworkReply has too many tests they should be broken up > * Some tests should be recognised as possible to fail, unit tests

Re: [Development] Code of conduct.

Alexis Menard said: > Hi, > > When I see recent behaviors, wording, comments on various mailing > lists, blog posts, or IRC against major contributors or regular > contributor I feel sad about it. I feel sad to hear bashing, complains > in a way they should not be said, i.e. impolite, arrogant, ag

Re: [Development] buildsystem branches (about to be) integrated

Oswald Buddenhagen said: > moin, > > the buildsystem branch of qtbase is currently being integrated. this is > ~120 commits worth of qmake & project file fixes and cleanups. there are > some changes to how modularization (in particular configure tests) is > handled, and cross-building should be su

Re: [Development] buildsystem branches (about to be) integrated

Stephen Chu said: > > Is this buildsystem branch the one we get when we just clone qt5 clean? > By that I mean if I go through the steps documented here: > http://qt-project.org/wiki/Building-Qt-5-from-Git is that the same as > this branch. > Hi Stephen, No, the buildsystem branch has not ye

Re: [Development] Can't switch submodules to master and Mac build still broken

Stephen Chu said: > I still can't get Qt 5 build on OS X for the merged code > (https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,28604) hasn't showed up in Qt > 5 git default yet. So I want to to try moving modules to master to get > the fixes by the instruction here: > http://qt-project.org/wiki/Buil

Re: [Development] More CI people?

Girish Ramakrishnan said: > Hi QA team, > I think today is the second day, CI is getting stuck. I wish I could > just restart the integration. Usually, it's easy to let Rohan know if > we are somewhere in his timezone. But if we are not in his timezone, > it's quite frustrating. > > There's also t

Re: [Development] Qt 4.8 autotests need attention; over 100 insignificant tests!

Thiago Macieira said: > On quarta-feira, 13 de junho de 2012 17.32.43, Friedemann Kleint wrote: > > In Qt 5, this was solved by introducing the QFINDTESTDATA macro, but > > porting it to Qt 4 is a non-trivial task. > > > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,28579 (Fix QLibrary test) and

Re: [Development] Becoming a Tier 1 platform and the CI System

Molkentin Daniel (Nokia-MP/Berlin) said: > > > It means that the current CI infrastructure is operated by Nokia and > > can't have build nodes plugged in from outside of Nokia premises. So, > > if you need to manage your own build nodes, there is currently no way to > > integrate with the Qt Proj

Re: [Development] Becoming a Tier 1 platform and the CI System

Sean Harmer said: > On Wednesday 06 June 2012 12:02:23 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > > On 6/6/12 1:56 PM, "ext Sean Harmer" wrote: > > >I understand and integrating into the CI system would seem by far the > > >most > > >sensible way to go in terms of maintainability, reducing man-power at > > >re

[Development] Qt 4.8 autotests need attention; over 100 insignificant tests!

Hi all, When Qt 4.8 was moved to gerrit, corners were cut to get it working with the Qt 5 test infrastructure. This included the disabling of many autotests, ostensibly as a temporary measure. Unfortunately this temporary situation has, to date, not been followed up on, and we still have greater

Re: [Development] Quick2 and Directx11 backend (Angle)

Friedemann Kleint said: > Hi, > > after some polishing, then change has been merged as > e7f1106edb1ac37d92d7851c44cd8d99f68eaaf4 . > I have added some build instructions to > http://qt-project.org/wiki/Building_Qt_5_from_Git for everyone to try out. > > We might decide later to add the library

Re: [Development] Binary incompatible changes to Qt 4.8

Turunen Tuukka said: > >> > >> If feasible, I would like to see both Mac OS X 10.8 and Windows 8 (to > >>the > >> extent it is know at that time) working in the 4.8.3 release, as well as > >> Ubuntu 12.04. > >> > >> In addition to making the obvious fixes it would be important to do > >> regular

Re: [Development] Build broke on Windows 7 64bit, whatever out-of-source or in-source-tree

Loaden said: > > > > Generating Code... > > link /LIBPATH:"d:\qpSOFT\Projects\BuildQt5-x64\qtbase\lib" > > /LIBPATH:"d:\qpSOFT\Projects\BuildQt5-x64\qtbase\lib" > > /LIBPATH:"d:\qpSOFT\Projects\BuildQt5-x64\qtbase\lib" /NOLOGO /DYNAMICBASE > > /NXCOMPAT /DEBUG /DLL /MANIFEST > > /MANIFESTFILE:"deb

Re: [Development] Build broke on Windows 7 64bit, whatever out-of-source or in-source-tree

Loaden said: > Windows SDK 7.1 & ActivePerl 64bit & Python 2.7.3 > Any comments? > Maybe some comments if you share the build log :) ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Binary incompatible changes to Qt 4.8

Turunen Tuukka said: > > On 24.5.2012 15.32, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > > >On quinta-feira, 24 de maio de 2012 12.13.31, Yan Shapochnik wrote: > >> Since you are back porting this change to 4.8, I would also like to > >>make a > >> suggestion and include Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion support in th

Re: [Development] Current qt5 version from git does not compile with VS2010

Helmut said: > Some days ago I wrote: > > a few days after the alpha release of qt5 the git version (with git pull > > qt5; perl init-repository -f) stopped to compile with Visual Studio 2010. > > Compiling qqmlopenmetaobject.cpp results in this error: > > d:\qt\qt5\qtdeclarative\include\qtqml\5.0

Re: [Development] Bugreports for Playground projects

Laszlo Papp said: > > The Qt Project lacks Jira maintainance man power, or what is the reason > behind ? > I think so ... certainly nobody seems passionate about it, at least. And nobody has it as one of their primary responsibilities as far as I know. __

Re: [Development] qtphonon's status.

Stephen Kelly said: > On Thursday, May 17, 2012 18:31:43 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > > I don't want to maintain a fork of phonon on qt-project if the developers > > decided they want to continue within the KDE infrastructure. phonon should > > have one upstream place where it is being developed.

Re: [Development] Cross build failed of unsupported/win32-g++-cross mkspecs

k blammo said: > >> "+ /home/loaden/qpSOFT/Projects/BuildQt5-w32/qtbase/bin/qmake > >> /home/loaden/qpSOFT/Projects/Qt5/qt.pro" > >> > >> What is that doing there? You really should be running "make" at that > >> point, not qmake. > >> > > > > That is being run by "configure". > > > > Strange, tha

Re: [Development] Cross build failed of unsupported/win32-g++-cross mkspecs

k blammo said: > On 16/05/2012 06:42, Loaden wrote: > > Hi, All! > > I want cross build Qt5.0 on Ubuntu 12.04, because I deleted all Windows > > OS on my laptop. > > But now I have a trouble of the cross build. So, I need you help in here. > > I just noticed this at the end of your configure log:

Re: [Development] Build issue with configure -developer-build for qtbase?

Thiago Macieira said: > > I am guessing you all have transitioned to 64 bits for your build > > system, etc. What is your policy statement on 32 bit systems? Try > > not break them? They deserve to get broken? ??? For me I will > > probably just transition my work to 64 bits even if our lega

Re: [Development] How to submit an approved patch?

Carl Schumann said: > Qt developer community, > > I am a first timer at this process, but have now managed to get a change > approved: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/26041 > According to http://wiki.qt-project.org/Qt_Contribution_Guidelines I > should now submit my patch. I am looking for

Re: [Development] Current qt5 version from git does not compile with VS2010

Helmut said: > Hi, > > a few days after the alpha release of qt5 the git version (with git pull qt5; > perl init-repository -f) stopped to compile with Visual Studio 2010. > Compiling qqmlopenmetaobject.cpp results in this error: > d:\qt\qt5\qtdeclarative\include\qtqml\5.0.0\qtqml\private\../../.

Re: [Development] important: upcoming rename of _qpa.h to _p.h

Girish Ramakrishnan said: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Girish Ramakrishnan > wrote: > > The change landed. For some reason, the ci is failing compile in all > > other modules. Works locally with shadow builds but not on CI. I am on > > it. > > > > Fix is integrating: https://coderev

Re: [Development] Qt 5.0 beta and final timelines

casper.vandonde...@nokia.com said: > > > >In the meantime we can/should think about doing another alpha. Thiago > >proposed that one option here could be to simply release the first source > >package that works on all platforms as the second alpha. Like that we > >don't > >use any additional resou

Re: [Development] [CI] reverse dependency testing

Storm-Olsen Marius (Nokia-MP/Austin) said: > Looks good, but please move the details over to the other wiki. > The Mediawiki installation at wiki.qt-project.org has been deprecated since > DevNet was moved over and we got www.qt-project.org/wiki. > Thanks, then there should be some message on th

[Development] [CI] reverse dependency testing

A while back, it was requested that the Qt Project CI should reject incoming changes to QtBase if they would cause compile or autotest failures in QtDeclarative. That is now implemented, which should reduce the risk of accidental source or behavior incompatible changes in qtbase. However, if you

Re: [Development] Can't build docs anymore!

Loaden said: > I don't think this is a good idea, realy. > We should find out a better way. > Yes, that was only a workaround. qtdoc/doc/doc.pri should be modified to avoid building such a huge command. As far as I know, it is valid to set an environment variable in one make command and make us

Re: [Development] Can't build docs anymore!

Loaden said: > NMAKE : fatal error U1095: expanded command line ... too long > Any comments? You could possibly work around this by putting your sources in a shorter path, e.g. D:\Qt5. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists

Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta

jason.mcdon...@nokia.com said: > > Random question of the day: do you happen to have stats about how > > often those insignificant tests actually fail? That should help to > > figure out which ones are actually working, and therefore should not > > be marked as insignificant. > > I'm glad you aske

Re: [Development] Towards a Qt 5 beta

marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com said: > On 04/11/2012 07:49 AM, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com > wrote: > > ** insignificant tests ** > > We still have quite some tests (around 110 in total) marked as > insignificant. This means they will be ignored by the CI system. Any help

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.0 alpha released

simo.f...@nokia.com said: > Moi, > I can't provide you an easy way but I can show you a way to get the alpha > out of git (see below). But yes, it is true that there isn't any tag in > git but I hope we will fix that in future releases. Hmm, it's not too late to fix it for _this_ release though. T

Re: [Development] Compiling Qt5 Alpha on Linux fails

marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com said: > Try following the instructions here > http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5-Alpha-building-instructions > > Qt should not be configured in such a way that it needs to be installed. > That's not a supported build configuration for the alpha. > Only in-source non-

Re: [Development] The qtbase CI should run the qtdeclarative tests

Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP/Oslo) said: > On 3/19/12 2:11 AM, "ext Rohan McGovern" wrote: > > >marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com said: > >> While it's not normal to do this type of dependency "lock" for upwards > >>dependencies, i think in this ca

Re: [Development] The qtbase CI should run the qtdeclarative tests

marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com said: > While it's not normal to do this type of dependency "lock" for upwards > dependencies, i think in this case we should indeed do the extra checking. > Not just because QtDeclarative is such an important tech for Qt5, but also > because it's a very good test ca

Re: [Development] Nominating Kurt Korbatits for approver

jason.mcdon...@nokia.com said: > All, > > I'd like to nominate Kurt Korbatits for approver status. Kurt worked on > Qtopia, Qt and Qt Mobility from 2005 to 2010 and rejoined Nokia's Brisbane > team in late 2011. Since then he has been working on improving the state of > Qt's autotests with a

Re: [Development] cast ... increases required alignment of target type [-Werror=cast-align]

Thiago Macieira said: > On quarta-feira, 14 de março de 2012 21.37.23, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > > >Possible options: > > >a.) fix the underlying warning (probably very tough for alpha one) > > >b.) remove -Wcast-align from the headersclean.pri for the alpha one? > > >c.) don't mind

Re: [Development] Staging of qtdeclarative changes has been blocked while we try to unpin the qtbase SHA1

Richard Moore said: > On 12 March 2012 17:56, wrote: > > Besides flaky tests, we also have the general/recurring problem of changes > > going into qtbase that break qtdeclarative (and possibly/likely other > > modules). While I realize it's time-consuming for everyone to manually > > build and

Re: [Development] cast ... increases required alignment of target type [-Werror=cast-align]

Thiago Macieira said: > On quarta-feira, 7 de março de 2012 09.34.35, Rohan McGovern wrote: > > Does anyone have a suggestion on how to fix this warning? > > > > This code in qlist.h: > > > > 409: template > > 410: Q_INLINE_TEMPLATE void QList::node_d

[Development] cast ... increases required alignment of target type [-Werror=cast-align]

Does anyone have a suggestion on how to fix this warning? This code in qlist.h: 409: template 410: Q_INLINE_TEMPLATE void QList::node_destruct(Node *from, Node *to) 411: { 412:if (QTypeInfo::isLarge || QTypeInfo::isStatic) 413:while(from != to) --to, delete reinterpret_cast

Re: [Development] Mirror of Qt on github?

Holger Hans Peter Freyther said: > Hi, > > my jenkins build server is having a lot of build issues due of gitorious.org > not being able to serve via the git protocol (git-daemon). One of the latest > failures can be seen here[1]. Should we try to have Gerrit replicate to > github.com or any other

Re: [Development] Qt Project CI having a bad day

Rohan McGovern said: > Sergio Ahumada said: > > Hi, > > > > The Qt Project CI is having some problems as we speak, and most likely > > will continue like it for next couple of hours. > > > > Changes in INTEGRATING state will be either integrat

Re: [Development] Qt Project CI having a bad day

Sergio Ahumada said: > Hi, > > The Qt Project CI is having some problems as we speak, and most likely > will continue like it for next couple of hours. > > Changes in INTEGRATING state will be either integrated or rejected once > the CI is back. > > We'll keep you informed about the progress.

Re: [Development] qtwebkit-examples-and-demos.patch

Philip Ashmore said: > Hi there. > Please find attached a patch for qtwebkit-examples-and-demos that allows > the build to complete on Debian Wheezy amd64. > > Please also note that this patch includes a previously submitted patch, > not yet applied. > > Also, examples/webkit/fancybrowser/fancy

Re: [Development] Tests, Shadow-Build and Cross-Compilation

Holger Hans Peter Freyther said: > On 01/29/2012 09:21 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > > >> The other part/wish would be to always have deployment targets for the > >> testcases and generate a run script or such as part of the installation. > > > > There is QFINDTESTDATA and QTest::qFindTestData t

Re: [Development] Use make before you push and stage

Giuseppe D'Angelo said: > On 30 January 2012 03:51, Rohan McGovern wrote: > > I don't think it is a good idea. > > Having errors with incremental builds which go away when you do a clean > > build is one thing, but there are also some issues which _should_ > &g

Re: [Development] Suggestion for new CI: "early warning" for qt5.git

Kent Hansen said: > Hi, > Sometimes there are changes to qtbase that the author and/or reviewers > strongly suspect will break one or more modules on top of it (e.g. in > qt5.git). For example, source-incompatible changes (removing > QEventLoop::DeferredDeletion), or changes to the meta-type/QOb

Re: [Development] Suggestion for new CI: "early warning" for qt5.git

Olivier Goffart said: > On Friday 27 January 2012 09:09:46 Kent Hansen wrote: > [...] > > If there is no quick fix, the last resort is to "pin" one or > > more of the dependencies' to a particular SHA1 (e.g. from the qt5.git > > submodule) in the sync.profile until the issue has been resolved, then

Re: [Development] Use make before you push and stage

Stephen Kelly said: > I wonder if it's possible for the CI system to maintain and clone > a working master build which patches could be applied to and build > incrementally? (an un-clean build) > Andreas said: > How about investigating incremental builds? Could reduce compile time > to just a f

Re: [Development] Use make before you push and stage

Jedrzej Nowacki said: > > You are assuming that we need to test every patchest which would be nice, > but it is not necessary. A bot-tester would be sufficient, it might be added > as > a reviewer by human reviewer only if it makes sense. > I like this idea and had been thinking along the

Re: [Development] Tests, Shadow-Build and Cross-Compilation

Olivier Goffart said: > On Sunday 29 January 2012 21:13:25 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I finally got around to play with my personal jenkins[1] setup again, > > specially to learn (and be kind of an example on how a non Tier1 platform > > could ever become one). > > > >

Re: [Development] Instructions how to set up cherry-picking between Qt5 and Qt4 repositories?

ext-sami.1.rosend...@nokia.com said: > > Hi > > I am backporting fixes I have pushed to Qt5 to Qt4.8 now that 4.8 is > available in gerrit. I got comments to my Qt4.8 patches that I should > preferably cherry-pick the Qt5 commits to Qt4. I do not know how to set up my > environment to enable t

Re: [Development] Compiling Qt5 on Ubuntu Oneiric

Kate Alhola said: > Has anyone succeeded to compile current git snapshot with Ubuntu oneiric ? Yes - but always without webkit. This also came up in thread [Development] Trying to setup environment to contribute. Error building webkit http://www.mail-archive.com/development@qt-project.org/msg

Re: [Development] Removing QtWebkit from gerrit (& qt5.git)

Robin Burchell said: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Rohan McGovern > wrote: > > Unfortunately the qtwebkit pointed at by qt5.git is outdated and known > > not to work. > > Given that webkit is developed upstream inside webkit.org, I'd second > that there&#x

Re: [Development] How to create new Qt modules or tools

Laszlo Papp said: > > 1) Build and software testing service > Is there a build and software testing service provided for projects in > the Qt Playground repositories ? I have not seen any mentionings about > that so far. and it is an important question in my case, for instance. > I have been using

Re: [Development] V8's location

Stephen Kelly said: > On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 13:54:37 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Friday, 28 de October de 2011 12:38:38 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > > > We've been moving this lib quite a bit already. If we move it again, I'd > > > prefer it would end up at it's final location. The mov

Re: [Development] Trying to setup environment to contribute. Error building webkit

Jordi Pujol said: > Hi all, > > I've been trying to set up a personal clone of qt5 to start contributing > as explained in wiki page. > > http://developer.qt.nokia.com/wiki/Building_Qt_5_from_Git > > I'm in gerrit, I've been successful to get the source initialized the > repositories, configured

Re: [Development] Missing ARM, MIPS, other mkspecs in qt5

Thiago Macieira said: > On Wednesday, 30 de November de 2011 15.47.00, Rohan McGovern wrote: > > Hello, > > > > In Qt5, we no longer appear to have any mkspecs for cross-compiling for > > ARM or MIPS. They were tied up with qws, so they were removed when > >

[Development] Public Qt5 CI results available

Hello, We've been able to move forward with publishing logs from the Qt Continuous Integration system, which (prior to now) have only been visible from within Nokia. The CI logs are available at: http://testresults.qt-project.org/ For users of codereview.qt-project.org, any new test result li

[Development] Missing ARM, MIPS, other mkspecs in qt5

Hello, In Qt5, we no longer appear to have any mkspecs for cross-compiling for ARM or MIPS. They were tied up with qws, so they were removed when qws was removed. Is it intentional that we still don't have any, or has it just fallen out that way and we're free to add some generic ARM, MIPS mkspe

Re: [Development] [Qt5-feedback] 3rdpart platform plugins, tests and CI

Holger Hans Peter Freyther said: > On 11/25/2011 02:40 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > On 10/31/2011 11:30 PM, Sergio Ahumada Navea wrote: > > > >> 2) Build -> Execute Shell > >> Command (without the #): > >># git clean -dqffx > > > > I finally had a little time and my ques

Re: [Development] [Qt5-feedback] 3rdpart platform plugins, tests and CI

Holger Hans Peter Freyther said: > On 11/03/2011 07:06 PM, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > > > Yes, I agree that it'd be nice to avoid the recompile in that case. > > However, this is the best way to be really certain your module works > > against whatever it depends upon. It's not a huge issue on a

Re: [Development] NOTE: Gerrit going down for quick fix deployment (13:30 CET)

marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com said: > On 11/17/11 1:12 PM, "ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com" > wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Gerrit will go down at 13:30 CET today, for deployment of fixes for the > >following issues: > >https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTQAINFRA-167 > >https://bugreports.

Re: [Development] configure qtbase on mac os

Chris Meyer said: > I'm configuring qtbase (Mac OS 10.6.8, Xcode 4.2, and qtbase/master) > using the following command: > > export QTDIR=/some/path/for/installation > ./configure -prefix $QTDIR -opensource -no-sql-mysql -qt-libpng > -qt-libjpeg -no-dbus -nomake examples -nomake demos > > After a

Re: [Development] qtsystems doesn't compile - mtcore mandatory dependency

Thiago Macieira said: > On Wednesday, 2 de November de 2011 19:01:21 Aaron McCarthy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 06:47:08 pm ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > PS: are the unit tests outside qtbase ever compiled? The qtxmlpatterns > > > ones > > > don't build for me. > > > > This depen

Re: [Development] QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE and QT_DISABLE_DEPRECATED_BEFORE

Thiago Macieira said: > On Wednesday, 2 de November de 2011 10:53:40 bradley.hug...@nokia.com wrote: > > On 02 Nov, 2011, at 01:29 , ext Rohan McGovern wrote: > > > I also noticed that Brad recently added the ability to pass through > > > options like -Werror

Re: [Development] [Qt5-feedback] 3rdpart platform plugins, tests and CI

Holger Hans Peter Freyther said: > > >> how difficult will it be to only checkout/update/build qtbase and not > >> _all_ of > >> Qt? Is this something that is planned? > > > > That is already the way it works - as Shane Kearns pointed out in a > > followup mail. For testing qtbase, you get qt5,

Re: [Development] QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE and QT_DISABLE_DEPRECATED_BEFORE

Thiago Macieira said: > On Tuesday, 1 de November de 2011 10:55:49 Frans Klaver wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > One more thing: QT_DEPRECATED expands to empty during the Qt build. > > > > > > Should we enable QT_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS? > > > > FWIW, my perso

Re: [Development] qtsystems doesn't compile - mtcore mandatory dependency

Robin Burchell said: > 2011/11/1 Thiago Macieira : > > I cannot find this mandatory dependency. If it's open, can someone share the > > link to where it can be found? If it's not open, please disable this > > functionality. > > I guess this might be a consequence of qtjsondb becoming available: >

Re: [Development] [Qt5-feedback] 3rdpart platform plugins, tests and CI

Holger Hans Peter Freyther said: > On 10/31/2011 11:30 PM, Sergio Ahumada Navea wrote: > > > 1) Source Code Management -> Git > > URL of repository: git://gitorious.org/qt/qtbase.git > > Branch Specifier : master > > > > Finally, you can see my build log: http://pastebin.com/iNVph7DP . T

Re: [Development] [Qt5-feedback] 3rdpart platform plugins, tests and CI

Holger Hans Peter Freyther said: > On 10/24/2011 04:21 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > On 10/24/2011 04:01 AM, Rohan McGovern wrote: > > Hi again, > > the response I am responding to ended up in moderation, I am now properly > subscribed (in contrast of using g

Re: [Development] New circular buffer container for Qt5

Sean Harmer said: > Hi, > > I would like to introduce a new generic container class to Qt, > QCircularBuffer. This email is to see if there are any objections to doing so. > > This class is similar to QVector but it provides circular semantics. For > example, appending to an already full circul

Re: [Development] Keep dependent projects in mind when approving changes

marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com said: > Hi Maintainers and Approver, > > Please keep in mind dependent modules when you approve and merge in > changes which can lead to dependent projects failing. If you know that a > commit has a risk of destabilizing other modules, please ensure that you > are prep