On Wednesday 10 December 2014 17:14:19 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 10. December 2014 13.26.57 Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> > > The easiest workaround is to get pkg-config to work for you.
> >
> > well pkg-config is not broken, because I did something specific on my
> > box, it is the distro itse
On Thursday 20 November 2014 10:13:26
Dov Grobgeld wrote:
> Will it help if I create a minimum program
reproducing the problem?
I can't comment on your actual problem, but
yes, this is definitely the way to go...
___
Development mailing list
Developmen
Also, any chance someone can look after this bug before 4.8.6 gets released?
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-24815
Thanks, René
On Friday 04 April 2014 15:57:25 Robert Löhning wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just reopened
> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-20094
> because menus
On Friday 07 March 2014 13:53:05 Christoph Feck wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2014 12:05:09 Tom Isaacson wrote:
> > I needed this functionality in our application so I've written a
> > demo app to handle pausing and resuming HTTP and FTP downloads:
> > https://github.com/parsley72/QtDownloadManager
>
On Friday 24 January 2014 14:08:45 Jocelyn Turcotte wrote:
> Hello,
>
> those are only cherry-picks and are unrelated to WebSockets. Other than that
> WebKit in 4.8.6 only has a few bug fixes more than 4.8.5.
OK, thanks the heads up!
> The unofficial QtWebKit 2.3 release should have better suppor
BTW, I saw this in the change-log of the Qt 4.8.6 snapshot:
QtWebkit
- Bring in WebKit revisions 139553 and 139921
Does anybody know if this means support for RFC WebSockets (RFC 6455)?
QtWebKit int Qt 4.8.5 only supports the hixie-76 draft protocol version.
QtWebKit in Qt 5.1+ at leas
On Friday 17 January 2014 09:19:12 Helmut Mülner
wrote:
> Will Qt 5.3 cointain Qt3D (finally)?
>
> Hopefully
I'd love to see that included in 5.3 as well!
Cheers, René
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/
Hi!
Dunno if this has been brought up before, but there's also this weird bug
still present in Qt 4.8.5 for Mac OS X:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-23673
The simple patch I attached to the bug fixes it for me and others... anyway,
it would be great if that got fixed in 4.8.6 :
On Tuesday 06 August 2013 09:57:42 qtnext wrote:
> I always package the qml in a ressource file. That is not the issue
It's the QML imports that aren't deployed properly, but that's already an
issue in Qt 4.
I fixed that with the attached script that's called after macdeployqt...
HTH, René
#!/bi
On Monday 10 December 2012 10:05:06 Thomas Hartmann wrote:
> I think we really should emphasise that QML is part of Qt and not
> something different that has its own mailing list.
Right.
> Also keeping the QML discussions in the core mailing list ensures
> visibility and might even attract new peo
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:37:58 +0200, Alberto Mardegan
wrote:
> Hi all!
> At some point I might need to use XEmbed, so I'm interested in helping
> out the implementation of QX11EmbedWidget in Qt5, as time permits.
> Now I'm just studying the code to evaluate how much of an effort it
> would be.
I
On Monday 15 October 2012 18:47:44 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 15.10.2012, 20:35, "Konrad Rosenbaum" :
> > Call me a hopeless case, but the first thing I do on a fresh KDE is
> > changing the style to one of those two because I find them more visually
> > aiding than Oxygen (they have better contra
Yep, worked perfectly!
Thanks again, René
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 08:45:02 R. Reucher wrote:
> Thanks, Lukas! I'll try that...
>
> On Tuesday 25 September 2012 07:59:16 Lukas Geyer wrote:
> > Am 24.09.2012 13:16, schrieb R. Reucher:
> > > Also, can someone c
Thanks, Lukas! I'll try that...
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 07:59:16 Lukas Geyer wrote:
> Am 24.09.2012 13:16, schrieb R. Reucher:
> > Also, can someone confirm that we are seeing the same issue(s)?
>
> Yes, I can. 4.8.3 is broken and cannot be used to compile projects
>
On Thursday 16 August 2012 10:47:18 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 16 de agosto de 2012 10.42.12, R. Reucher wrote:
> > I agree mostly, but don't forget the functionality / APIs (i.e. the X11
> > ones) that have been dropped for no apparent reason. I know that the
On Wednesday 15 August 2012 22:52:48 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
> Qt 5.0 offers many great new things as well as good level of compatibility
> with Qt 4.
I agree mostly, but don't forget the functionality / APIs (i.e. the X11 ones)
that have been dropped for no apparent reason. I know that they will so
16 matches
Mail list logo
