Looks good.
Regards,
Liang
From: development-bounces+liang.qi=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on behalf of
Frederik Gladhorn
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 12:54 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Qt 5.6.0 header diff: QtWebCh
Looks good(nothing changed).
Regards,
Liang
From: development-bounces+liang.qi=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on behalf of
Frederik Gladhorn
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 12:56 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Qt 5.6.0 hea
The reason for the failure integration is:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/84376
And the fix for it is available in https://codereview.qt-project.org/84543 .
Tested locally, works fine on my 10.9.2.
Just need to wait CI to integrate it.
Regards,
Liang
From:
This issue is valid since Qt 5.0.0... More details in
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-31724
My "temporary" solution is build my qt libs with "-developer -debug
-no-framework", it works fine both with creator and xcode.
Regards,
Liang
From:
: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Loading moc plugins when running tests in CI system
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 06:18:19 Qi Liang wrote:
> Looks like it's a qml plugin, then maybe there is an example/practice in
> qtquickcontrols.
They are not a QML plugin, they are position and
Looks like it's a qml plugin, then maybe there is an example/practice in
qtquickcontrols.
https://github.com/qtproject/qtquickcontrols/blob/stable/tests/auto/auto.pro
https://github.com/qtproject/qtquickcontrols/tree/stable/tests/auto/testplugin
https://github.com/qtproject/qtquickcontrols/blob/s
What is qt modularization for? We want to have different release cycles for
different qt modules.
Then +1 for that.
For offline installer, I suggest, a separate installer for it, but it should
based on installed qt directory. It is compatible with 5.2.0 release in this
way.
For online installe
Hi, Renato,
I had added Alex and Lorn as reviewers of your changes. And there is a
#qt-mobility channel, you can find them there.
Regards,
Liang
From: Renato Araujo
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 8:02 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] [QtP
Hi, Yuchen,
Yes, everyone wants to have as more features and modules as possible in
the(every) release. But plan is just plan, some work hasn't finished, then
can't be part of a release.
If you really want to see sth happen, please join the development and push it
as you want. The reason is mu
Hi, all,
dev is for 5.2, and stable is for 5.1.1 and forward now. A commit has already
been merged in dev branch, I guess it means that we(or someone) decided to have
that feature for 5.2. But now, it was cherry-picked into stable branch, then it
will be duplicate when the merge happened betwee
Hi, Tony,
Could you let us know when this issue will be fixed? At least the CI hasn't
work well since 5pm yesterday.
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/ci-reports/2013-May/
Regards,
Liang
From: Sarajärvi Tony
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:06 PM
To: developme
Hi,
Tony and Stephen, yes, our CI need more attention now.
Tony, does it look like we need a CI for our CI system? I mean to verify those
update work or not, for example, the Java update, Windows 8 shutdown and etc.
Any plan for this?
Regards,
Liang
__
+1 for this.
I met with this non-fast-forward case today. Sometimes, when people are
mirroring a git repo, and "git push --mirror" doesn't work well for some
reason. Then "git push --all" is a second choice, and this non-fast-forward
will break "git push --all". Better to warn of those force pu
Hi, all,
Some friends in Chinese local qt forum started to talk about this issue.
Current qt-solutions repo:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#admin,project,qt-solutions/qt-solutions,info
http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-solutions/qt-solutions/
But there are only 9 in total.
Based on the documentati
Hi, all,
Before Open Governance, we have the public git repo on gitorious. But now
codereview(gerrit) is the main repo, and gitorious one is only mirror of it.
GitHub is much more popular and stable than gitorious, could we have a git
mirror there? Thanks.
Regards,
Liang
_
At 22/04/2013 03:14, from Thiago Macieira:
> My server just let me know:
>
>>From git://gitorious.org/qt/qtbase
> 60fbb00..c5a3cfa dev -> dev
> 1f3a67e..f78842a stable -> stable
> ! [rejected] winrt -> winrt (non-fast-forward)
>
> PLEASE let the mailing list know
> Merging is not an easy task. (I know it, I was doing the merge during Qt 4.x
> times)
> It is easy for someone unexperimented to mess up.
> Which is why I think only experimented developer should do the merge.
Not that easy like Qt 4.x ages(we only have 1 repo, and we could do that merge
per we
> Let's be more clear: no commits were lost. They are all still present.
>
> However, due to conflicts, some changes may have been improperly resolved.
> This
> is no different than any other merge, in any direction.
Yes, it's "lost" because of conflict resolve. And we recorded the conflicts
in
Hi, all,
I think it's important, your commits in stable branch perhaps lost after dev
branch merged. At least we found one case:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/51722
Before the big merge happened recently, we normally will fix some bugs in
stable branch(5.0), and they will be merged into de
> Actually, the merges are already happening, so 5.1 *is* feature frozen.
>
> Please target your updates to stable if you're updating within minor (non-
> feature) releases of your third-party or if you're fixing important bugs.
>
> Updates for the sake of update should be in dev and will wait for
>qtimageformats:
> libmng
> libtiff
libmng is some kind of obsolete, last release is 20030305.
I had two patches for libtiff, just not merged in before the BIG merge.
Resubmitted to stable branches already.
Regards,
Liang
___
Development m
And we have a blog from Denis about that:
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2011/06/14/string-collation-with-locales/
Regards,
Liang
On 3/9/13 8:59 PM, "Knoll Lars" wrote:
>There's a QCollator class in Qt already to fix exactly that problem, the
>plan is to make it public for Qt 5.1.
>
>Cheers,
>Lar
Looks like still no success since Thu Mar 7 14:17:21 CET 2013
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/ci-reports/2013-March/005401.html
And latest fail time is Sat Mar 9 11:12:00 CET 2013
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/ci-reports/2013-March/005564.html
More details in
http://lists.qt-projec
tests/prebuild/license in qtqa repo is just for that purpose though I am not
sure how it got run on every qt5 module repo.
http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtqa/trees/master/tests/prebuild/license
Regards,
Liang
On 2013-3-1, at 下午12:24, Hirvonen Olli wrote:
I discussed with Tuukka Turunen and his op
On 2013-3-1, at 上午9:12, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On sexta-feira, 1 de março de 2013 11.38.54, Иван Комиссаров wrote:
Hello, i would like to request a repository in a playground for my
QDriveInfo module.
This class allows to retrieve information about a system volumes - like
available size, filesyst
The original talk in Dec, 2012:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/releasing/2012-December/000930.html
Maybe not many people have noticed it.
In my own opinion, they are from 4.7-digia and 4.6-digia branch, better name
the packages like that. Otherwise, need to merge them to upstream at first
Hi, Yuchen,
Yes, there are still many bugs in docs. Could you report it jira? Any
contribution is welcome.
And Xingtao Zhang( https://codereview.qt-project.org/#dashboard,1000698 )
started to work on doc fix recently, maybe you can get help from him or assign
the bug report to him.
Regards,
L
+1
At least it needs to be modularized for Qt 5.
Regards,
Liang
From: development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Sletta
Gunnar [gunnar.sle...@digia.com]
Sent: Monday, Novemb
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:06 PM, Peter Hartmann wrote:
> some months ago, I was confident that this would be something temporary;
> unfortunately, practice has shown that so far we always had a few
> commits (1-10) that we needed to "short-circuit" into our branch because
> some internal tea
It's not difficult to understand. For example, 4.8.4 was released, it means
v4.8.4 was taged. All later changes after that in 4.8 branch don't belong to
4.8.4. They must be part of next release of 4.8 branch, obviously it is 4.8.5.
So the version bumps to 4.8.5 should happen just after 4.8.4 rel
Hi, all,
5.0 branching is almost finished this weekend.
And I just started to go through "Not Evaluated" items in
jira(https://bugreports.qt-project.org/) last night. I found there are still
about less than 300 tasks in open/reported status. I tried "git log
--grep="symbian" --regexp-ignore-ca
Hi, Chen Qi,
Glad to see your contribution. But in qt-project era, maybe you could
contribute it to Qt via open governance way.
Reference:
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/01/10/qt-4-moved-to-open-governance/
http://qt-project.org/contribute
And if you are Chinese, maybe you could also try th
At least for me, browser could display simplified Chinese characters correctly
on mac. BTW, all the old text codecs are in QtCore 5.0 now. Maybe someone with
your configuration could verify it works or not.
Have you created bug report?
Regards,
Liang
From: deve
Sorry, can't reproduce your issue on 10.6.8. The default compiler on 10.6.8 +
xcode 3.2.6 should be g++ 4.2, not clang++. Apple doesn't provide it. So maybe
you are asking for the support of clang++ on 10.6, I guess.
And I think it's better to talk this kind of issue in "interest" mailing list,
Welcome back to QtSensors!
Write a script in qtrepotools, clone the missing dependent repos and build one
by one?
Regards,
Liang
From: development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org] on behal
For real auto test, it's very different to run between on real hardware and on
other emulator solutions.
But I agree with Thiago that emulator solutions is better than real hardware
for CI, CI can't be too slow on some specific platforms.
We really need to have daily build and auto test running
I guess it's related with this change, adb156e4dd64609ba6c0b172e9c428a79e306a7c
https://codereview.qt-project.org/37451
Regards,
Liang
From: development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of
Any plan for osx-10.8-64, Mac OS X Mountain Lion, 10.8? Thanks.
Regards,
Liang
From: development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Koehne Kai
[kai.koe...@digia.com]
Sent: Tuesday
38 matches
Mail list logo
