plicit
pointer_to_void -> some_pointer_type
IS NOT, and compiler, issuing error messages will help you to avoid some
troubles.
From: René J.V. Bertin
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 5:51 PM
To: Pocheptsov Timur
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re
In C++ you can do:
int * p = NULL;
double * d = NULL;
if NULL was (void *)0 - you'd have a compilation error in C++, since there is
no such implicit conversion.
And yes, void * in C++ can be indeed considered generic, because you can do
this:
int * p = ...
void * pv = p;
Though I did not notice that your 'One' is actually 0.
From: development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on
behalf of Denis Shienkov
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 5:45 PM
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Use
> #if QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE(5, 2)
> Three,
> #endif
skips three making Four == 3.
From: development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on
behalf of Denis Shienkov
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 5:45 PM
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Hi,
I still need these :
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/122894/
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/122855/
reviewed (and hopefully approved).
Ah, and this:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/122860/
Best regards,
Timur.
From: developm
Yes, it's fixed?
From: Aaron McCarthy
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 6:38 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Cc: Pocheptsov Timur; Albert Astals Cid
Subject: Re: [Development] [Mac] tst_qquickwindow::testWindowVisibilityOrder()
regression
On Thu, 1
For me this test fails with 5.4 and passes with 5.5, so something was fixed :)
(the test code is the same, of course).
Best regards,
Timur.
From: development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on
behalf of Albert Astals Cid
S
Hi.
I'll have a look.
Best regards,
Timur.
From: development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on
behalf of Albert Astals Cid
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 9:53 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] [Mac]
Thank you guys! :)
Best regards,
Timur.
From: development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on
behalf of Blasche Alexander
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:18 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Nom
Actually, we have to fix configuration on OS X: Secure Transport is enabled
with -no-openssl (-securetransport is not required) and this can be undesired
side effect
From: development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on
behalf o
v.erase(v.begin(), v.end()) ?
From: development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
on
behalf of Smith Martin
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 3:36 PM
To: Milian Wolff; Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject:
AFAIK the better examples/ideas can be found in the design rationale of
std::optional.
For example (may be, also the bad one:) ), it can be good if you can
distinguish initialized/non-initialized state, instead of
having
int m_val; //every possible integer value is reasonable
bool m_valInitializ
12 matches
Mail list logo
