On Feb 19, 2016, at 11:38 PM, Petroules Jake
mailto:jake.petrou...@theqtcompany.com>> wrote:
* We require the latest Xcode toolchain and OS X on the Mac for compiling (see
separate mailing list thread). We support deployment to OS X 10.9 and later
(dropping 10.8)
+1
* On iOS, w
On Feb 19, 2016, at 10:58 PM, Andreas Holzammer
mailto:andreas.holzam...@kdab.com>> wrote:
Hi,
What about support for Windows IoT, which might be the successor of WEC.
Are there plans to support this?
Isn't this implicitly covered under Universal Windows Platform (Windows 10 +
WinRT APIs)?
T
Drop the "mobile". Qt is a cross platform project and there does not seem to be
any technical reason to restrict this to mobile platforms. So, just "Backend as
a Service".
On Feb 14, 2016, at 3:54 AM, Guillaume Charbonnier
mailto:gcharbonn...@simplisim.net>> wrote:
Hi all !
Following my last
Another advantage for end users is that they are guaranteed to get the latest
platform features supported by that version of Qt if their OS version also
supports them.
For example, if Qt is built with the 10.11 SDK and therefore provides a fast
WKWebView implementation, users running on 10.11 w
On Feb 10, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Tor Arne Vestbø
mailto:tor.arne.ves...@theqtcompany.com>>
wrote:
On 10/02/16 17:06, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2016 12:00:00 PST Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
Does anyone see any issues with this going forward?
We need to be sure Qt compile
o, dropping iOS-6 is a not issue for me, but dropping iOS-7 - yes.
jm2c
Kind regards,
Robert
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Petroules Jake
mailto:jake.petrou...@theqtcompany.com>> wrote:
We're raising the minimum OS X to 10.8 (2012). The iOS minimum is still 6 (also
2012), but I wonde
We're raising the minimum OS X to 10.8 (2012). The iOS minimum is still 6 (also
2012), but I wonder whether we should also raise that a version (or even two)
considering its uniquely rapid upgrade cycle (frequently upgraded hardware,
less user ability to opt out of software updates).
Bumping it
On Dec 27, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Mike Krus
mailto:mike.k...@kdab.com>> wrote:
Hi
has anybody taken this any further?
Just pushed a new patch set which should be mergeable now pending no further
complaints.
Enabling dynamic builds as frameworks causes link errors. For example, when
linking QtNet
On Nov 25, 2015, at 12:24 PM, René J. V. Bertin
mailto:rjvber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Petroules Jake wrote:
[snipped]
The only open question is what `macLocation` domain should be returned by
QSP::TempLocation: kUserDomain, kSystemDomain or kOnAppropriateDisk . Maybe
Jake Petroules a
On Nov 25, 2015, at 6:52 AM, René J.V. Bertin
mailto:rjvber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> You're missing a detail. On OS X, $TMPDIR (and QDir::tempPath()) *are* user
>> specific. They're also very "immemorable"...
>
> They're not required to be. If we can detect that they ar
On Nov 24, 2015, at 2:25 AM, René J. V. Bertin
mailto:rjvber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
PS: why did Qt choose ~/Library/Application Support for that location? Isn't the
stuff stored there supposed to be volatile that doesn't need to survive reboots
or end up in (Time Machine) backups?
~/Library/Appl
On Nov 11, 2015, at 12:21 PM, David Faure mailto:fa...@kde.org>>
wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2015 19:09:58 Petroules Jake wrote:
Feel free to do whatever you like for test mode but do not change the existing
writable paths.
Jake, I would like to understand why you say that. As t
On Nov 11, 2015, at 8:20 AM, René J.V. Bertin
mailto:rjvber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wednesday November 11 2015 16:03:31 Petroules Jake wrote:
I don't understand, what do you mean with "there is only one location"?
I mean the API returns a single value, not a list. Howeve
On Nov 11, 2015, at 7:53 AM, René J.V. Bertin
mailto:rjvber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wednesday November 11 2015 15:32:20 Petroules Jake wrote:
No, there is only one location so it must remain /Applications as expected by
anyone on the OS X platform.
I don't understand, what do yo
On Nov 11, 2015, at 7:13 AM, René J.V. Bertin
mailto:rjvber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wednesday November 11 2015 15:52:33 David Faure wrote:
Cross-posting on Qt's development ML because it seems more than relevant there.
To put things in context: this discussion on kde-frameworks-devel was star
15 matches
Mail list logo
