Re: [Development] Requesting a repository for Qt Tasking

+1 for the qt/qttasktree suggestion, I agree that's a better name. //! Paul > On 30 Jun 2025, at 07:54, Jaroslaw Kobus via Development > wrote: > > Redirecting the discussion to the right list... > > Jarek > > > Public > > From: Jaroslaw Kobus > Sen

Re: [Development] Nominating Teea Põldsam for approver rights

+1 In my experience, Teea contributes to discussions and displays a collaborative mindset. //! Paul On 6 May 2025, at 12:03, Riitta-Leena Miettinen via Development wrote: Hello Qt development, I would like to nominate Teea Põldsam as an approver for the Qt project. Teea has been working as

Re: [Development] Adding a .gitreview to all repos

I decided to make it easy for y'all: vote with your feet :) https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/topic:"add-gitreview-config"; //! Paul On 13 Feb 2025, at 12:48, Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote: On 12 Feb 2025, at 22

Re: [Development] Adding a .gitreview to all repos

I second this, it looks like a useful addition. If it improves the contribution experience for a group of contributors, I'd say this is a no-brainer. Feel free to add me to the review(s), Cristian! Kind regards, Paul Wicking Staff Software Engineer Qt Group On 12 Feb 2025, at 17:52, Marc Mutz

Re: [Development] Nominating Tero Heikkinen as an approver for the Qt Project

+1, collaborating with Tero has been an enjoyable experience. On 20 Jan 2025, at 10:43, Jukka Jokiniva via Development wrote: Hi all, I would like to nominate Tero Heikkinen for approver rights in the Qt project. Tero has been working in the CI team over two years, mainly contributing to pro

Re: [Development] Changed Branding on doc-snapshots.qt.io

On 16 Dec 2024, at 14:39, David Redondo wrote: Thank you for your replies and explanations! I quite like the new sidebar where you can access everything quite easily. The font color/weight changes probably will take some time before I will get used it to it, first impression was that it feels

Re: [Development] Changed Branding on doc-snapshots.qt.io

> On 16 Dec 2024, at 14:39, David Redondo wrote: > > Thank you for your replies and explanations! > > I quite like the new sidebar where you can access everything quite easily. > The font color/weight changes probably will take some time before I will get > used it to it, first impression w

Re: [Development] Changed Branding on doc-snapshots.qt.io

On 16 Dec 2024, at 10:55, David Redondo wrote: Hi, Hi David, while looking at the What's new for 6.9 I noticed that doc-snapshots.qt.io changed branding to "Qt Group" instead of "Qt" (logo and colors, and some style changes in the sidebar). For example compare https://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt6-

Re: [Development] Proposal to retain \since version information in Qt Documentation

> On 24 Sep 2024, at 22:37, Axel Spoerl via Development > wrote: > > > - It’s of course visible in cpp files. If I have my hands on C++, I tend to > believe more in git blame’s version of the gospel. Axel, I wanted to mention something that slipped my mind yesterday. I agree that version co

Re: [Development] Proposal to retain \since version information in Qt Documentation

> On 24 Sep 2024, at 23:13, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > We didn't start adding them until post 4.0. I don't think 3.x had the tag at > all and APIs new in 4.0 weren't marked as such either. That means the > furthest > back we can go is 4.0. Qt 3 to 4 was also a massive update, so I don't think

Re: [Development] Proposal to retain \since version information in Qt Documentation

> On 24 Sep 2024, at 22:37, Axel Spoerl via Development > wrote: > > Some thoughts to add: > > - I can’t seem to find any pattern / rules as to when a \since tag was added > in the past. Some APIs have a \since 4.x tag, some have nothing at all. > Putting effort into regulating the removal

Re: [Development] Proposal to retain \since version information in Qt Documentation

> On 24 Sep 2024, at 19:24, Christian Ehrlicher via Development > wrote: > > You're aware that noone will see those \since tags in any documentation > except he builds it by himself (which even I did not manage until now for > unknown reasons - maybe because I try to build the documentation

Re: [Development] Proposal to retain \since version information in Qt Documentation

On 24 Sep 2024, at 17:48, Kai Köhne wrote: Just keep in mind that we weren't always strict about adding these in the past, so for accurate results, git history is arguably the more reliable source. That is, unless you're interested in changes that predate the big git import in Qt 4 times 😉 Y

Re: [Development] Proposal to retain \since version information in Qt Documentation

> On 25 Sep 2024, at 06:41, EXT Mitch Curtis wrote: > > I'm confused... \since does show up in the generated documentation: > > - https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qml-qtquick-item.html#focusPolicy-prop > - https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qml-qtquick-listview.html#displayMarginBeginning-prop > Hey Mitch! The

[Development] Proposal to retain \since version information in Qt Documentation

Dear Qt Developers, I am writing to address a series of recent code review changes that propose removing the `\since [version]` documentation strings from various modules in Qt: - https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/592996/2 - https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/592997/2 -

Re: [Development] Nominating Matthias Rauter for approval status

+1 :) On Jan 30, 2024, at 13:11, Paul Tvete via Development wrote: Hi, I would like to nominate Matthias Rauter as an approver for the Qt Project. Matthias has been working on Qt for more than a year now. In this time, he has done great work on Qt Location and Qt SVG, among other. I have had

[Development] Nominating Jaishree Vyas as approver

Hi everyone, I would like to nominate Jaishree Vyas for approver rights in the Qt project. Jai has joined TQtC as a Documentation Engineer back in February 2022. Since then, she's been actively making and reviewing changes. I fully trust Jai's judgment in reviewing and approving changes, and se

Re: [Development] Lots of qdoc-related warning messages when building 'docs' target in Qt-6.6.0?

On 22 Oct 2023, at 05:21, Haowei Hsu wrote: Hello, Paul. Hi! I've read https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qdoc-warnings.html, but still don't figure it out. BTW, I also tried to build docs of Qt-6.5.3, and still encountered the same problem. For example: [snip] You can see the full logs in attachmen

Re: [Development] Lots of qdoc-related warning messages when building 'docs' target in Qt-6.6.0?

On 21 Oct 2023, at 11:20, Haowei Hsu wrote: Hello, Volker. To resolve those, make patches to gerrit that fix them :) Do you mean that it is actually a bug? A warning from QDoc indicates that there's an issue in the documentation. The QDoc manual describes how you can go about to resolve the

Re: [Development] How to document API only deprecated in future Qt versions

On 15 Sep 2023, at 10:44, Edward Welbourne via Development wrote: On 9/15/23 09:36, Kai Köhne via Development wrote: The methods are formally marked as deprecated for Qt 6.10. But the methods are already in the '-obsolete' page for Qt 6.6, which leaves the API in a weird in-between state. Chr

Re: [Development] Proposal: (re)move qt5.git/_clang-format

On 13 Sep 2023, at 16:25, Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote: I find the input from clang-format’s sometimes helpful, sometimes annoying. And the source of the annoyance is not that clang-format points out things that I could have formatted differently, but that our pre-commit hook retu

Re: [Development] Proposal: (re)move qt5.git/_clang-format

On 12 Sep 2023, at 22:33, Ahmad Samir wrote: _clang-format isn't picked up by clang-format by default, you'd have to rename it to .clang-format. clang-format reads either of them [0]. It's unnecessary to rename the configuration file. [0] - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormat.html#stan

Re: [Development] BC/SC in patch releases (particularly enum additions)

On 23 Aug 2023, at 15:39, Marc Mutz via Development wrote: Hi, I cannot find Eddy's email in between, In case you're still looking for it: https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2023-August/044348.html //! Paul -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://list

Re: [Development] Failed to run configure.bat in qt/qt5 repository on Windows?

> On 20 Aug 2023, at 20:36, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > The top-level build is finicky and only supported as a convenience. It breaks > often because it's not what the CI uses. Please compile and build each module > only, unless you plan on helping fix those issues. So my suggestion is that

Re: [Development] Nominating Santhosh Kumar Selvaraj for approver rights

+1 :) > On 21 Jun 2023, at 03:24, EXT Mitch Curtis via Development > wrote: > > +1 > >> -Original Message- >> From: Development On Behalf Of >> Jan-Arve Sæther via Development >> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 2:56 AM >> To: Jack Simcox via Development >> Subject: [Development] Nomin

Re: [Development] Nominating Konrad Kujawa as approver

+1 On 24 May 2023, at 13:03, Mårten Nordheim via Development wrote: +1 :) Also same team Mårten From: Development mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org>> on behalf of Ievgenii Meshcheriakov via Development mailto:development@qt-project.org>> Se

Re: [Development] Nominating Tinja Paavoseppä as an approver for the Qt Project

+1 Changes: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:tinja.paavoseppa%2540qt.io Reviews: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:tinja.paavoseppa%2540qt.io On 21 Mar 2023, at 08:50, Nicholas Bennett via Development wrote: Hi all, I'd like to nominate Tinja Paavoseppä as an approver for

Re: [Development] Nominating Mats Honkamaa as an approver for the Qt Project

+1 Mats is an excellent technical writer, and has previously contributed to both Qt 3D and Qt Creator. He also provides useful feedback and suggestions as part of his reviews (see list at https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:mats.honkamaa%2540qt.io). (I have to admit I am absolutely baf

Re: [Development] Nominating Mikołaj Boć as approver

+1 On 21 Dec 2022, at 15:42, Morten Sørvig via Development wrote: Hello again, Correct links to gerrit should be: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:Mikolaj.Boc%2540qt.io https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/reviewer:Mikolaj

Re: [Development] How to modify the "Full Name" of Jira?

Hi, get in touch with jira-ad...@qt-project.org for these types of requests. Cheers, Paul On 21 Dec 2022, at 03:28, JiDe Zhang wrote: Hi, My account of Jira is "zccrs", I want to modify my "Full Name" to "JiDe Zhang", but I can't find an edit button for it.

Re: [Development] Nominating Axel Spoerl as approver

+ 1 Couldn't be happier to back this nomination up. I'm impressed at how Axel never misses a chance to step up and help his colleagues if he can. His mentality reminds me of what Pippi Longstocking says – "I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that" – and