On 4/14/20 5:28 AM, Lars Knoll wrote:
On 14 Apr 2020, at 10:17, Nathan Myers
mailto:n...@cantrip.org>> wrote:
On 4/13/20 3:41 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
It also doesn't require smoking crack to suggest that
WG21 considers code breakage due to new identifiers
clashing with exis
On 4/13/20 3:41 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 06:11, Nathan Myers wrote:
The prevailing feeling in the room, when the vote was taken,
was that Qt people MUST BE SMOKING CRACK if they think
the ISO 14882 C++ Standard should or would tiptoe around Qt's
aggressive
o modest. Just change the default,
in a single step: eliminate the abusive macros, as any
responsible organization would have done *decades* ago.
(An accompanying apology for past abuse would not be out of
place.) Anybody who wants to keep using the abusive macros
already knows how. The
