Re: [Development] Clarification needed for Qt Script's future over QJSEngine/Value

2014-11-26 Thread N. N.
> On Wednesday, 26 November 2014, 14:15, Hausmann Simon > wrote: > > Hi, > > You are right, we need to add a few more features to QJSEngine. > > I'm not so much in favor of the default prototype for meta type api anymore, > as it promotes the creation of slow conversion code I think. If you

[Development] Clarification needed for Qt Script's future over QJSEngine/Value

2014-11-26 Thread N. N.
I was looking at using QtScript for a project and noticed that all work has been "ABANDONED" for using the new java script engine V8 as noted in http://qt-project.org/wiki/V8_Port and then pouring over other bug reports & the mailing list about QtScript and how QtScript won't be updated to use