Hi Chris,
On Di 17 Mär 2020 01:42:11 CET, Chris Adams wrote:
[...]
Potentially. The licensing of QtPIM only changed recently (in terms of
changes), and Jolla's fork of QtPIM remains LGPLv2.1, so IMO if the
upstream were to change, I think taking that version might be a sensible
option, as i
Hi Chris,
On Mo 16 Mär 2020 01:55:44 CET, Chris Adams wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 5:47 AM Mike Gabriel <
mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de> wrote:
Hi Chris,
thanks for following up on my questions.
On Fr 13 Mär 2020 01:32:24 CET, Chris Adams wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I don't know
Hi Lorn,
On Sa 14 Mär 2020 20:45:32 CET, Lorn Potter wrote:
Hi,
On 13/3/20 10:32 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
* qtsystems
* qtfeedback
* qtpim
I am about to upload the first (qtsystems) to Debian and before doing
that, I'd like to know, if these projects can be considered API/ABI
stab
Hi Chris,
thanks for following up on my questions.
On Fr 13 Mär 2020 01:32:24 CET, Chris Adams wrote:
Hi Mike,
I don't know much / anything about QtSystems,
Ok...
perhaps Lorn has more
Ok, I'll try to ping him directly via mail. Thanks for the pointer.
information about that.
I am c
Dear Qt upstream maintainers,
I am currently packaging some Qt5 modules for Debian in the context of
packaging Lomiri (formerly named Unity8) for Debian.
I have come across dependencies in the Lomiri software stack that are
available on Qt's Git server, but have not seen any recent releases
