Re: [Development] QML Runtime

2012-12-11 Thread Mark Constable
On 12/12/12 05:38, Alan Alpert wrote: > What would a ~/.qmlrc file contain? Anything if it's just a QML script. I see it as extra convenience that a simple "qml somescript" invocation could load /etc/qmlrc *and* ~/.qmlrc (override), if they exist, to customize the current qml instance. I really l

Re: [Development] Qt Playground - Command Line Parser experiment

2012-03-15 Thread Mark Constable
Any simple standard cli args parser included with Qt would be overwhelmingly better than none at all even if it's just -s shortops (/s for win) and worry about --longopts and tar-like variations for Qt6+. The simpler the better as long as it's universally available in qtcore, if possible, sooner th

Re: [Development] New Wayland Plugin instructions (on the Wayland web site)

2012-01-29 Thread Mark Constable
On 29/01/12 21:47, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> http://wayland.freedesktop.org/qt5.html >> >> Also, the above URL suggests pulling "qtbase" and there is also >> a very obvious "qt5" repo. Could anyone verify which repo is >> the real qt5? > > Huh? https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase versus https://q

Re: [Development] New Wayland Plugin instructions (on the Wayland web site)

2012-01-28 Thread Mark Constable
On 29/01/12 13:21, Rick Stockton wrote: > ... > http://wayland.freedesktop.org/qt5.html I'm trying out these notes too, on Archlinux x86_64, and only got as far as this error at the early qmake build stage... "The Wayland functionality test failed" any hints as to what system components might s

Re: [Development] Qt 5 Raspberry Pi device program

2011-11-24 Thread Mark Constable
On 2011-11-24 09:22 AM, quim@nokia.com wrote: > In any case don't hold your breath for Taku: it's just a collection > of upstream packages required to run Qt 5 on top of the hardware. > But we are glad that you ask since it will surely welcome more > expertise in order to get the plumbing below

Re: [Development] Qt 5 Raspberry Pi device program

2011-11-23 Thread Mark Constable
On 2011-11-23 02:51 PM, Quim Gil wrote: > We hope it is useful for the Qt Project to speed up Qt 5 testing > and development as well as to get the first wave of Qt 5 apps, > ported or created. This is going to be so much fun, Qt5 and $50 hardware (delivered). Where or how can we found out more ab

Re: [Development] QtWeb

2011-10-25 Thread Mark Constable
On 2011-10-25 11:32 PM, Gábor Lehel wrote: > > Lastly, ties to a scripting language would be excellent, and it > > would be great if we could start with Lua since it is dead simple > > to tie in with C/C++ code, and then add Python capability as we > > get going farther into the project. > > I am

Re: [Development] QtWeb

2011-10-24 Thread Mark Constable
On 2011-10-24 09:38 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote: > QtWeb: https://gitorious.org/qtweb/qtweb > > Web framework for Qt, right now, all we have decided is the FastCGI > base. These might help with the webserver itself... https://github.com/nikhilm/qhttpserver (the above uses NodeJS's http://github.co

Re: [Development] Crazy Idea

2011-10-24 Thread Mark Constable
On 2011-10-24 05:55 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote: > So, no matter how we look at this, we obviously need: > > 1) FastCGI support There maybe some clues here if you are not aware of it... https://github.com/fredemmott/fastcgiqt > 2) A web server that supports async With lighttpd and nginx as exampl