On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:52 AM Kyle Edwards via Development <
development@qt-project.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 13:44 +, Cristián Maureira-Fredes wrote:
> > Hey Kyle,
> >
> > thanks for your answer,
> > out of curiosity, are there some past business models
> > that failed inside Kitw
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:59:03PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>> On Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:45:27 AM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> > not all people have agreed on it. the linux distro centric camp (which
>> > has a disproportiona
2011/12/9 Stephen Kelly :
> On Friday, December 09, 2011 20:12:05 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>
>> This week:
>
> Oops, sorry. This was not intended for the Qt mailing list.
>
> I was compiling it for colleages.
>
I would love to see something like this on the Qt development list,
even if accidentally dis
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
> On 12/01/2011 03:05 PM, ext Sergio Ahumada Navea wrote:
>> https://wiki.qt-project.org/Public_Autotest_Infrastructure
>
> Thanks!
Yes, thanks - this certainly makes things much clearer on the auto
test side of things.
>
> https://wiki.qt-project.o
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Sergio Ahumada Navea
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/01/2011 08:13 PM, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I attended the Qt Contributor Day in San Francisco [1], and talked a
>> little about infrastructure for the Qt project. At Kitwar
Hi,
I attended the Qt Contributor Day in San Francisco [1], and talked a
little about infrastructure for the Qt project. At Kitware we have
been building on the topic branch functionality developed for the Qt
project, adding features and fixing bugs we found in a branch
available on Github [2].
I
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:44 AM, wrote:
> On 11/14/11 5:13 PM, "ext Oswald Buddenhagen"
> wrote:
>
>>moin,
>>
>>due to about a dozen bugs, a few of them fairly serious, i went ahead
>>and disabled the topic review functionality. it will come back, but not
>>necessarily this year. :}
>
> Have yo