Comment from peanut gallery,
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40856
> This code should produce the same results with -std=g++11 and -std=c++11
> I will not object to patches tweaking the condition and positively reviewed
> by fellow maintainers.
It sounds like the GCC maintainers
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 2:14 PM samuel ammonius wrote:
>
> > First, your own example of not having compile-time checking of the means
> > that
> > those programmers are accepting less security for the sake of staying in the
> > same language.
>
> How? It's just the equivalent of static_cast(), an
> its apps and users. Many of these programs are built on top of years of C
> code,
> so I don't think it would be easy for the developers of those programs to
> switch
> from C to C++ even if they wanted to.
Allan’s proposal to keep the code C but ensure it builds with a C++
compiler likely had p
>> There's a couple things I still haven't figured out though, like
>> constructors/destructors and templates. Are there solutions to these that
In C, constructors/destructors usually become alloc/free functions. C
has macros and code generation but these aren’t directly analogous to
templates.
I
Hi Qt,
The Qt git repositories can at times seem large. Git has support now
for "filtering" or "partial clone". Some hits from a websearch:
- https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/topics/git/partial_clone.html
-
https://github.blog/2020-12-21-get-up-to-speed-with-partial-clone-and-shallow-clone/
This feat
