On 4/05/2016 7:39 PM, Lars Knoll wrote:
On 02/05/16 14:37, "Development on behalf of Sze Howe Koh"
wrote:
Hello,
The LICENSE.GPLvX and LICENSE.LGPLvX files from
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/ (and submodules) start with
"The Qt Toolkit is Copyright (C) 2015...", but then they
What about VS 2013?
On 20/02/2016 7:01 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
Hi,
Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that we update our list of
supported compilers and platforms for Qt 5.8. After some discussions with
different people, here's an initial proposal from my side:
* We drop support for
It's relatively simple to compile x264 with visual studio 2013+. I was just
reading about it.
On 4 Feb 2015 11:52 pm, "Guido Seifert" wrote:
> If you don't have a choice, you don't have a choice, but just saying:
> In one of my projects I needed the x264 libs:
> http://www.videolan.org/developers
On 8/29/2014 2:34 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2014 14:18:06 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
>>> I want an API that makes it clear that detection may fail or be
>>> ambiguous.
>>> Call it "storage locality" or "storage remoteness" or, hopefully, some
>>> better name.
>>>
>>> The more
Any idea why the Qt examples can't be found anywhere in the arch
packages and are of course not listed in Creator?
On 5/9/2014 11:45 PM, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> You're repeating yourself without adding any explanatory information.
>
> When releasing software for other people to use, normally you'd
I'm guessing it has something with the unified title and toolbar on mac fix?
On 01/23/2014 10:17 PM, Adam Strzelecki wrote:
> I have just noticed that OSX 5.2.1 offline snapshot (clang) DMG is 60MB
> slimmer (396 MB) than it was in 5.2.0 (455 MB). Do you know what is the
> reason of such differe
Most of the functionality was already in Qt 4 and was moved out for Qt 5
because of maintenance issues and different code for different platforms
exposed to the customer.
On 02/09/2013 10:35 PM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
> I agree the "Extra" looks superfluous. In fact I'd like to go a bit further
>
On 2/27/2013 2:12 AM, BRM wrote:
>> From: Thiago Macieira
>> To: development@qt-project.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:46 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Development] Evolving Qt's multithreading API
>>
>> On terça-feira, 26 de fevereiro de 2013 07.03.37, BRM wrote:
>>> Personally, I can
On 02/14/2013 05:58 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Friedemann Kleint wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we also plan to start Qt Windows Extras to bring at least the missing
>> image conversion functions ( QTBUG-27103 ) back provided we can find
>> someone to create the repos
On 02/14/2013 05:58 PM, Ivan Vizir wrote:
Hello,
There're no problems with Qt Windows Extras. As I said somewhen in
January, I plan to contribute to Qt my code, when it's done. Current
results you can see at http://github.com/dtf/QtWindowsExtras .
For now features what are ready are:
--- progr
On 02/07/2013 02:11 AM, Charley Bay wrote:
Mitch sayeth:
I think a lot of people are hesitant to contribute fixes because
of all of the
setup required to contribute, also (yeah, it's easy once you are
familiar with
it). ,
+1
It would be nice to make this, "turn-key".
For
On 02/06/2013 11:20 PM, Koehne Kai wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
>> [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
>> Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 6:42 AM
>> To: developme
On 02/06/2013 04:07 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules
mailto:jake.petrou...@petroules.com>>
wrote:
Surely you meant darwin-g++-macx. :)
I don't think the Android mkspec warrants having Linux in it
simply because it's such a radically diff
On 02/05/2013 12:36 AM, Koehne Kai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Importing ICU into qtbase is fine with me. Anyhow, I don't particular like
> hard dependency to ICU from Qt5Core, since it forces everyone deploying a
> Windows helloworld to also ship icudt49.dll with 17,5 MB (!).
I hope that no one would depl
On 01/21/2013 10:06 PM, Iikka Eklund wrote:
> On 01/18/2013 03:37 PM, Motyka Rafal wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Qt 5.0.1 release testing has been started. We would like to kindly ask
>> the Qt Community for help by testing the new packages.
>>
>> 1. Installer packages are available here:
>> http:/
On 01/19/2013 03:47 AM, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote:
As many OS/WM utility methods were removed from Qt 5, we need to
reimplement their functionality in the QtWindowsExtras, QtMacExtras,
and QtX11Extras libraries.
For example, in QtMacExtras we have a unified toolbar implementation
that repla
On 01/17/2013 04:34 AM, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:37:27AM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> I can't find the current docs, but the mobility APIs already exposed a
>> wealth of system information in the SystemInfo plugin:
>> http://doc.qt.digia.com/qtmobility/qml-systeminfo.html
On 01/12/2013 09:26 AM, Sascha Cunz wrote:
> Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2013, 23:07:25 schrieb Shaw Andy:
>>> [...]
>>>
Microsoft in the past has also said that you should keep the
-MD(d)/-MT(d)
setting consistent so it is the same across all libraries and
applications,
>>> [...]
>>
On 01/13/2013 10:09 PM, Johan Thelin wrote:
Sorry for top-posting. I'm writing from my phone.
I've had a class like this for a project of mine. It exposed signals
for adding, removing and changing rows as well as the count, data and
setData methods.
This helped me peek and poke at a QAbstra
On 01/12/2013 07:43 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As part of the Android-port of Qt 5 being contributed to the Qt Project
>> by BogDan, he also contributed the code for a general-purpose Android
>> app which is used for getting libraries and plugins on demand when a Qt
>> app is deployed
Congratulations :)
On 12/18/2012 11:18 PM, Marc Mutz wrote:
... please cut me some slack while I handle the attached non-maskable
interrupt :)
Thanks,
Marc
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/
On 14/12/2012 8:27 PM, Martin Smith wrote:
> +1
>
> my problem with "I would prefer that you didn't submit this" is that -1 is
> often used without including an explanation of what is wrong and how it
> should be fixed.
>
> I like "This requires more work" better, but I think it will still be abu
dev, testing and release are pretty standard in most open source
communities (including every major linux flavor) and would avoid the
mass confusion that will result if you use dev, stable and release.
On 30/11/2012 5:10 PM, Anttila Janne wrote:
> Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at
I agree with d3fault on this one.
On 29/11/2012 1:07 PM, d3fault wrote:
> "always close to releasable" = testing
>
> -dev
> -testing
> -release or stable
>
> eradicates any chance of confusion, regardless of who is "right"
>
>
> d3fault
> ___
> Developme
On the wiki, it is reccomended to compile using nmake with a multicore
flag versus jom because of issues with jom.
On 16/11/2012 7:47 PM, Labs, Torsten wrote:
I could solve it by changing the command from jom.exe to nmake
Is that the right solution?
With best regards,
Torsten Labs
Siemens AG
Could openSuse Build Service results be used at all?
On 15/11/2012 12:38 AM, Stephen Chu wrote:
> On 11/14/12 8:37 AM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
>> 10.6 is separate issue. It is getting less relevant, but still has a
>> significant market share (31%)[0]. I would say it's a bit to early to drop
>> it.
On 11/6/2012 7:52 PM, d3fault wrote:
> You want to obey a randomly declared 'feature-freeze'
It wasn't randomly declared. :D It has been set in stone since around
May and is standard practice for open source projects near time for a
stable release usually starting at the first beta release. Other
Are there any reasons why this bug is closed? Shouldn't the fix version
have been moved up to RC1 instead?
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-26110
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/
On 10/20/2012 2:04 AM, d3fault wrote:
> Are you willing to put the security of your operations in the hands of
> all the wives and children who might have access to their dad's
> computer (he being a member of that trusted network of analysts)?
> Humans can be bought/persuaded/compromised/etc with
On 10/15/2012 10:21 PM, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
Pardon my ignorance; before reading this I thought that QtMobility had
been merged into Qt 5 as add-on modules. May I ask why functionality
is still being kept duplicated?
So did I, as well as QtMultimediaKit now being renamed to QtMultimedia
and ma
I got the old Qt4 QtSingleApplication addon compiling under Qt5 by
updating the includes and removing the QT_WA macro. But it doesn't seem
to be detecting the application any more under Windows. Could anyone
take a guess on why it isn't detecting open instances any longer? I also
changed Q_WS_X
I'm not sure if Jolla is using this specific functionality but I am
certain that they are using Qt and MeeGo.
On 9/12/2012 8:59 PM, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to remove a few more things from qt5.git.
>
> * Qt PIM
>
> The module is most likely not going to be maintained anymor
32 matches
Mail list logo
