This also means we can't ship it in Ubuntu, preferred modifiable form is a
requirement for free software
> d) Ship the libraries unmodified from upstream and include a link to where
> they were obtained and where to obtain the non-minified sources.
Pointing to somewhere else is not a valid wa
On 27 June 2012 06:12, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> My reasoning for renaming tools and libraries was relatively
> straightforward: They are not backward compatible and thus shouldn't
> be given the same since Qt4 and Qt5 will have to live together for a
> long time. Qt4 and Qt5 should be able to
Looking at Qt 5 for packaging in Ubuntu.
Qt 4 and 5 contain quite a lot of files with the same names, at the
Ubuntu Developer Summit in April we discussed the issue of bin/moc
qmake etc but I see all the libraries have the same name too so
probably development environments just can't be co-install
