Re: [Development] Request: devcontainer feature for vscodeext

2025-01-29 Thread Joerg Bornemann via Development
On 1/27/25 18:07, Alex Shaw wrote: Is anyone interested in seeing this officially added to Qt? That seems interesting. Do I understand correctly that the devcontainer spec [1] would go into a repo different from vsccodeext? And vscodeext would merely announce its existence? Cheers, Joerg

Re: [Development] Proposal to raise the minimum CMake version needed to build and use Qt 6.9

2024-11-14 Thread Joerg Bornemann via Development
On 11/14/24 09:14, Sune Vuorela wrote: Or is it more specific that you think that the backports-provided cmake will not be stable enough for building software? CMake is generally very good in regards to compatibility and building older and newer projects. The change in Debian unstable from

Re: [Development] Nominating Orkun Tokdemir as an approver

2024-09-25 Thread Joerg Bornemann via Development
On 9/25/24 08:53, Marcus Tillmanns via Development wrote: I’d like to nominate Orkun Tokdemir for approver status. He has been working on the Visual Studio Code extensions from the beginning and is currently the main Developer of it. He has also worked on the CMake side of Qt for a while. You

[Development] Change to QUIP 7

2023-09-05 Thread Joerg Bornemann via Development
Hi, we'd like to change the format of qt_attribution.json files a tiny bit. Currently, the Copyright key takes a string as value, and for readability purposes we used invalid JSON like this: "Copyright": "Copyright (C) 2002, 2003 CodeFactory AB Copyright (C) 2004, 2005 Red Hat, Inc." We w

Re: [Development] Failed to build Qt6 Documentation from qt/qtbase sources?

2023-08-01 Thread Joerg Bornemann via Development
On 8/1/23 14:22, Haowei Hsu wrote: However, it turns out that there is an error in the Step 7: You're doing a prefix build [1] but you did not build & install before building the docs. The error indicates a missing file in the install prefix. Try a non-prefix build instead. Without configur

Re: [Development] QUIP 18: License specification in Qt's modules

2023-02-16 Thread Joerg Bornemann via Development
On 2/15/23 14:46, Jörg Bornemann via Development wrote: we're proposing a new QUIP: License specification in Qt's modules Please review https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/meta/quips/+/436096 And because QUIP 3 suggests that the initial text is also sent to the mailing list - here's the docu

Re: [Development] Sub-arch optimisations (was: How qAsConst and qExchange lead to qNN)

2022-11-22 Thread Joerg Bornemann via Development
On 11/21/22 03:38, Thiago Macieira wrote: I've just finished a qtbase build on Linux with two sub-architectures and the symbol comparison of all the resulting libraries has shown zero difference. Tomorrow I will test all other modules (except qtwebengine). The code is ugly, so I'd appreciate gui