On 9/11/2015 9:19 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Friday September 11 2015 14:17:23 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
>> How can I find out why QMAKE_LIBS_OPENGL gets set to -lGL in qmodule.pri, or
>> why the library is tested in opengldesktop.pro?
>
> Answer 1: by sinking teeth where I'd rather not sink
On 11/18/2014 2:18 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>> I have not been able to find the code that generates the
>> .cmake files to figure out why it is not honoring the file extension
>> change.
>
> Here they are:
>
> qtbase/mkspecs/fea
On Fri, November 14, 2014 1:01 pm, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday 14 November 2014 12:43:40 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>> On Fri, November 14, 2014 9:58 am, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> > 2) User applications have plugins of their own
>>
>> I don't thin
On Fri, November 14, 2014 9:58 am, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> 2) User applications have plugins of their own
I don't think this would impact an end user app with its own plugins that
also uses Qt5 plugins. The application would have been compiled with the
paths for dlopen to search for its own plug
On OS X, Qt is building plugins as dynamic libraries, instead of
bundles, which is the more appropriate format for the platform. This was
filed as QTBUG 2227 six years ago, but it was marked as closed without
any work done on it, even though there was a patch listed. For the Fink
package manag
