Hello :)
I've lately not had time to contribute to Qt (personal life keeping me
busy).
Since Volker and others did a great job porting Qt Speech to Qt 6, they
know the code better than me by this time. I'd like to step down as
maintainer and allow those who actually contribute to take over.
Hereb
Hi all,
I'd like to pass on the torch and step down as maintainer for accessibility in
Qt.
I haven't been very active in the area lately. Jan Arve has been involved in
most improvements and been much more active in reviews and improving our
offering. I'd like to nominate him as new maintainer.
Hello Kevin,
On mandag 11. november 2019 11:31:16 CET Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > Am 11.11.19 um 09:10 schrieb Dmitriy Purgin:
> >> I understand that QML 2 is not going anywhere in Qt 6 but maintaining
> >> both QML 2 and QML 3 will be a burden for the developers of the Qt
> >>
Hi Mitch,
thanks for trying!
On mandag 14. oktober 2019 14:51:41 CEST Mitch Curtis wrote:
> As a side note, I installed it on Ubuntu 18.04.3 with:
>
> sudo apt-get install clang-format
>
> but there was no git-clang-format binary, even though
> https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=conten
Hi,
after just a bit over a year, we have a hint of progress on the state of using
clang-format.
If you use qt5.git, you'll get the git hook for it set up, to automatically
run clang-format on the lines you changed.
To benefit today, get the dev branch of qt5 and run init-repository -f --force-
CEST Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> On fredag 4. oktober 2019 06:33:33 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We have now soft branched '5.13.2' from '5.13'. Final downmerge from
> > '5.13'
> > to '5.13.2' will happen Fri 1
On fredag 4. oktober 2019 06:33:33 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have now soft branched '5.13.2' from '5.13'. Final downmerge from '5.13'
> to '5.13.2' will happen Fri 11th October. So please start using '5.13.2'
> for new changes targeted to Qt 5.13.2 release.
Even more, feel free
+1 from me :)
Cheers,
Frederik
On onsdag 2. oktober 2019 13:22:33 CEST Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to nominate Vitaly Fanaskov as approver for the Qt Project.
> Vitaly joined the Qt Quick and Widgets team about a year ago. He has been
> fixing bugs in widgets and Qt Quick,
>
> > New patch set is added only after successful integration.
>
>
>
> > --Jukka
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 30/09/2019, 7.57, "Development on behalf of Jukka Jokiniva"
> > > jukka.joki
Hi all,
I hope this is a complete no-event, but we'd like to give you a heads-up, in
case something unexpected comes up. We Gerrit admins are currently working
towards moving us to Gerrit 3.0.2.
The plan is to upgrade on Monday next week, the 30th of September.
There are no huge improvements in
On mandag 16. september 2019 12:22:06 CEST Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Albert Astals Cid (16 September 2019 11:33) wrote:
> > If i do
> >
> > git clone ssh://myu...@codereview.qt-project.org/qt/qtbase
> >
> > I get branch 5.12
> >
> > Given that 5.12 is now on cherry-pick mode (AFAIK) would it m
+1 from me as well, also from working on KDE things with David. And he's been
upstreaming stuff - yay :)
Cheers,
Frederik
On fredag 23. august 2019 14:15:59 CEST Johan Helsing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to nominate David Edmundson as approver for the Qt Project. David
> started contributing
André
>
> Am 01.07.19 um 19:57 schrieb André Pönitz:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:43:43PM +, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> >>>> and I'll give Gravatar a spin:
> >>>> https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/admin/repos/plugins/avatars-grav
> >
On søndag 2. juni 2019 11:50:35 CEST Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
> > On 1 Jun 2019, at 16:12, Alberto Mardegan
> > wrote:
> > On 5/31/19 4:24 PM, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
> >
> >> Nobody is forced to move to Qt 6 right away; Qt 5.15 is an LTS with
> >> three years maintenance. We are not expecting
And we're on 2.16.9, which brings no huge improvements as far as I can tell.
But it's great to gather some experience and more and more automate the
deployment of new versions. Enjoy!
On torsdag 27. juni 2019 16:53:26 CEST Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> > On 27 Jun 2019, at 16:10, F
On fredag 28. juni 2019 17:29:29 CEST Mutz, Marc wrote:
> On 2019-06-27 16:10, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> [...]
>
> > On a related note, now that things are generally working with the new
> > Gerrit,
> > I was wondering if we want to consider plugins. There is one to
Hi,
Just to keep the ball rolling, we prepared the upgrade to move from Gerrit
2.16.7 to 2.16.9. I don't expect any real changes, but it's a good exercise
for us to stay up to date and see if the scripting of the upgrade works.
The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every Gerrit vers
Hi all,
I'd like to nominate Jukka Jokiniva as approver for the Qt Project. Jukka has
been less visible in the past, since he was mostly involved with
infrastructure before, but he made the Gerrit upgrade happen and he is now
active as release manager, next to Jani.
His focus is on the embedded
On tirsdag 11. juni 2019 09:48:00 CEST Lars Knoll wrote:
> > On 11 Jun 2019, at 09:35, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> >
> > On 11.06.19 09:17, Lars Knoll wrote:
> >
> >> So, is removing it worth all the hassle to us and our users? Q_FOREACH is
> >> a macro and it doesn’t really cost us anything to kee
On tirsdag 28. mai 2019 16:26:18 CEST Florian Bruhin wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 02:17:19PM +0000, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> > If someone has other ideas, we can discuss them!
>
> On a related note - I'm a bit confused about the ellipsis in the subject.
> Why "C
PM CEST Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We got the suggestion to change the email template, now the subject lines of
>
what Gerrit sends to your inbox will be a bit more helpful.
>
> Old:
> Change in ...qtgamepad[5.12.4]: Add changes file for Qt 5.12.4
>
Hi all,
We got the suggestion to change the email template, now the subject lines of
what Gerrit sends to your inbox will be a bit more helpful.
Old:
Change in ...qtgamepad[5.12.4]: Add changes file for Qt 5.12.4
New:
[Gerrit] Merged - ...qtgamepad[5.12.4]: Add changes file for Qt 5.12.4
So yo
On lørdag 25. mai 2019 18:11:59 CEST Richard Weickelt wrote:
> > There are more tweaks that would be nice to apply to the UI to make it
> > better. Does the new version make this any easier? What's your advice for
> > people who'd like to contribute UI tweaks? What's the best way to
> > proceed? (i
On mandag 27. mai 2019 10:42:44 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> Hi,
> Initial ones here:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/message:%2522Add+changes+file+for+Qt+5.
> 12.4%2522+status:open
>
> Maintainers, please do needed modifications & make sure reviews are done
> during this week
Did the git l
Hi,
Staging for everything will now be disabled. Fingers crossed that tomorrow's
Gerrit upgrade works nicely.
Greetings,
Frederik
From: Development on behalf of Jukka
Jokiniva
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 9:34
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development
Hi Thomas,
Since the module exists, it's a bit unclear to me what you request (creating
the module would what I'd expect).
The next step would be to ask for inclusion in the releases and making a patch
to qt/qt5 to enable us shipping the module by default.
Then there's the question which state
On fredag 10. mai 2019 13:09:37 CEST Minenko, Vladimir wrote:
> > Please consider the wider use-case too
>
>
> Ok, we will. So, is it a "go"?
OK, https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/admin/projects/qt/qtanalytics now
exists.
Cheers,
Frederik
>
> --
> Vladimir
>
> On 10.05.19, 12:12, "Tor Ar
assistant"
>
>
> Sounds good! Thanks!
>
> --
> Vladimir
>
> On 08.05.19, 16:41, "Frederik Gladhorn" wrote:
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> It's great to hear that you've been looking into integrating Alexa and
> other
assistants as
On onsdag 8. mai 2019 16:06:02 CEST Edward Welbourne wrote:
> On 8 May 2019, at 10:24, Liang Qi mentioned:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/260927
>
> Shawn Rutledge (8 May 2019 15:43) replied
>
> > I don’t understand why a change that is just sitting there on Gerrit
> > can affect the merge.
Hello Vladimir,
On onsdag 10. april 2019 14:21:21 CEST Minenko, Vladimir wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request for a new repository:
>
> Name of the repository: qt-labs/qtuianalytics.git
> Description: An plugin for Qt Quick allowing collection of UI usage
> analytics.
Responsible person: Vl
Hi Vladimir,
It's great to hear that you've been looking into integrating Alexa and other
assistants as well, we have a few thoughts around this in The Qt Company and
have been drawing how a rough abstraction for several assistants could look
like. Sadly it's not easy to hook deeply into e.g. A
Hello,
We've been working on the Gerrit Upgrade for a while now and we are finally
getting ready to deploy the new goodness.
We have all patches in our fork (yes, sadly we continue diverging a bit from
mainstream, adding our own state handling for the CI).
The good news is that there are very f
On fredag 15. mars 2019 14:05:39 CET Robert Loehning wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> imagine the following situation:
> 1. Bug in 5.13 is reported
> 2. Patch with "Fixes: " is merged to 5.13 branch
> 3. Gerrit Bot closes the report with "Fix Version 5.13".
> 4. Reporter tests 5.13 branch, fix failed, reopens r
Hello,
I really like the idea Mikhail proposed. I would even go as far as to add one
platform where we start testing building Qt with CMake in the CI once we reach
a level where we are comfortable with it.
I think it makes sense to get the CMake port more exposed and let people play
with it in
This is great news, I'm happy to see Ulf taking over while Simon will be able
to give advice.
+1 (in case that wasn't clear)
Cheers,
Frederik
On mandag 18. februar 2019 14:25:15 CET Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to step down as the maintainer of the Qt QML module and pass the
> torc
On fredag 15. februar 2019 12:21:43 CET Martin Koller wrote:
> On Freitag, 15. Februar 2019 11:08:18 CET Andy Shaw wrote:
> > Since it has the +2 you can click on the "Merge patch 2 to staging" now,
> > is that button showing up for you?
> ah, great. Was not aware that I needed to trigger that.
> M
Hi,
On fredag 15. februar 2019 07:31:33 CET Lars Knoll wrote:
> Summing up the discussion here. It looks like people overall agree that the
> pinned dependency approach (option 3) sounds better than what we currently
> have. The main concern was CI capacity, but Frederik believes that with
> enoug
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for all the hard work :) It's not my area, so I won't be able to
comment on the patches as such.
Please add reviewers to all patches, so they don't get forgotten. While that's
quite some work, many people will only see email notifications from gerrit, or
look at their dashboa
rik
> Simon
>
>
> > On 18. Jan 2019, at 14:11, Frederik Gladhorn
> > wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to have some opinions about the gnuwin32 we currently have in
> > qt5.git. This way we provide flex and bison for Windows.
> >
On tirsdag 29. januar 2019 11:07:55 CET Alex Blasche wrote:
> >From: Development on behalf of
> >Frederik Gladhorn
> 2 Heads: use the latest revision of each branch (the system we used to have
> in the past)
>
> >3 Modules containing pinned dependency sha1s
&g
On onsdag 30. januar 2019 09:17:11 CET Alex Blasche wrote:
> >From: Development on behalf of Jedrzej
> >Nowacki >
> >Personally, I also do like the idea of monolithic repo, while keeping
> >
> >modularization on the logical / build level. In our current state I see two
> >major problems:
> >- our
On fredag 25. januar 2019 21:40:07 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday, 25 January 2019 01:10:35 PST Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > I do quite like what Allan suggested: We could try the cherry-pick the
> > other way around. Volker, Lars, Thiago etc. surely remember the p4i
> > script we used to have
Here are the options we discussed internally. I'm happy to elaborate more in
case something is unclear.
1 Do nothing / today / qt5.git
2 Heads: use the latest revision of each branch (the system we used to have in
the past)
3 Modules containing pinned dependency sha1s
Each module is c
Hi all,
I'd like to start another discussion around our development workflow.
We arrived at our current model of Qt modules (in the git repository sense)
and using qt5.git as a container for all of them through a series of steps and
changes. Mix in the evolution of the testing environment over t
Hi,
It's been a while, so I'd like to congratulate Mitch on becoming maintainer
for Controls 2 :)
I'll update the wiki.
Cheers,
Frederik
On mandag 26. november 2018 19:39:03 CET J-P Nurmi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you may have noticed, I haven't been actively working on Qt Quick
> Controls 2 s
On torsdag 27. desember 2018 11:05:28 CET Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> Am 27.12.2018 um 10:52 schrieb Allan Sandfeld Jensen:
> > It has been for me. I always put bugs I have a patch in review for "in
> > progress", and they have been consistently closed, except one time I found
> > a bug in the scr
Hi all,
I'd like to have some opinions about the gnuwin32 we currently have in
qt5.git. This way we provide flex and bison for Windows.
I think it's a bit mis-placed, in my opinion the tools which are needed on
Windows should be in their own sub-module.
I think we should continue to ship them a
Hi Uwe,
On torsdag 10. januar 2019 10:24:22 CET Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 07:24:01 +0000, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> >> Ours is LGPLv2+ as usual, FWIW.
> >
> > Which sadly makes it unsuitable for inclusion in Qt.
>
> I'm maintainer of the Qwt l
On onsdag 9. januar 2019 17:26:06 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 January 2019 06:23:02 PST Tuukka Turunen wrote:
> > Description: Lottie-Qt, a renderer for Bodymovin animations
>
> What's "Lottie" ? Is that an acronym? Or is it a trademark of something? If
> it's the latter, please f
Hi,
Thanks for pointing out that this alternative implementation exists.
On onsdag 9. januar 2019 17:18:50 CET Eike Hein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we've written one of those at KDE recently:
>
> https://github.com/kbroulik/lottie-qml
>
> We also submitted some patches to both Qt and Lottie to make it w
+1 from me as well.
Paul is interested in many areas and taking responsibility. He also started
helping out maintaining our Gerrit instance.
Cheers,
Frederik
On onsdag 12. desember 2018 11:58:47 CET Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would like to nominate Paul for approvership. He started b
+1 from me as well :)
Cheers,
Frederik
On tirsdag 20. november 2018 09:38:00 CET Richard Gustavsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to nominate Christian Ehrlicher for approver rights.
>
> He has done a lot of work in Qt, especially Widgets and Item Views, with
> more than 150 patches being merged dur
Hi all,
I had a bug in the bot closing issues. It may have accidentally assigned fix
version 5.12.0 beta 4 instead of 5.12.1 when changes went into 5.12 after the
5.12.0 branching.
That's fixed now and the bot is running again after taking a break this
afternoon.
Cheers,
Frederik
_
Hi all,
I would like to thank the people who have started this discussion. For me this
is a very positive thing and a step forward for the Qt community.
I really enjoy being part of the community. I want it to continue to be the
great group of people that it is today. And hopefully bigger, more
I just changed it into a review request, so everyone can have a look in
gerrit:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/244005/
Cheers,
Frederik
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/develo
I just changed it into a review request, so everyone can have a look in
gerrit:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/244005/
Cheers,
Frederik
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/develo
Hello again,
After another round of fixing (such as allowing to close issues that are 'In
Progress', because they have a different name for the transition), adding the
setting of the commit sha1 and no longer setting too many versions, we should
be live with a working bot.
I'm interested in is
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 10:24:17 AM CEST Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> One thing that would still be great to have is the jira links working so
> that the changes show up in JIRA like they do for Task-number, I'm looking
> into this and thought the config was fixed, but so far tha
Quick update:
Sanity bot and commit template (in 5.11, soon other places) are now updated
and the bot is running.
I'd appreciate if people tried using the Fixes: footer and let me know if the
issue is closed with the right version (or even better, if the fix version is
not set or incorrectly se
On onsdag 29. august 2018 20.17.52 CEST Robert Löhning wrote:
> Am 22.08.2018 um 10:53 schrieb Frederik Gladhorn:
> > Quick status update from my side:
> > I have the script running against a test installation of JIRA. It seems to
> > work, there are some small issues t
Quick status update from my side:
I have the script running against a test installation of JIRA. It seems to
work, there are some small issues to be worked out still.
- Qt Creator version numbers are verbose, so I need to be more generous in
matching strings, right now I don't detect the version
Hi James,
On torsdag 9. august 2018 10.24.26 CEST James Maxwell wrote:
> I read that you target a new QML TableView for Qt5.12. In one of my
> projects I will need to do a lot with TreeViews. Will the new TableView
> also serve as a TreeView (This would be helpful information so I can decide
> whe
ik
>
> > Everything else (wip/foobar, other branch names) will be ignored,
> > unless someone explains what to do with them otherwise.
>
> I think that's acceptable.
>
> André
>
> Am 08.08.2018 um 11:58 schrieb Frederik Gladhorn:
> > On tirsdag
On tirsdag 7. august 2018 14.10.08 CEST Alex Blasche wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Development > project.org> On Behalf Of Jani Heikkinen
> >
> > >The plan is to update the fix versions and close the task as done when
> > >a line in the commit message starts with "Fixes:".
> > >
On tirsdag 7. august 2018 14.14.56 CEST Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 11:46:12AM +0200, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> > I've spend a bit of time writing a script that monitors gerrit and the git
> > repositories to update JIRA statuses. It's not qu
On tirsdag 7. august 2018 15.23.52 CEST Robert Löhning wrote:
> Am 07.08.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Frederik Gladhorn:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've spend a bit of time writing a script that monitors gerrit and the git
> > repositories to update JIRA statuses. It's not
Hi all,
I've spend a bit of time writing a script that monitors gerrit and the git
repositories to update JIRA statuses. It's not quite done yet, but getting
there.
Basically it should be able to set the fixed version and close tasks
automatically.
Assuming there is no major protest, I'll use
On onsdag 20. juni 2018 13.01.10 CEST Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> On 20 Jun 2018, at 12:13, Lars Knoll wrote:
>
> >
> > I can’t see how clang-format will make you jump through any sort of hoops.
> > Creator already has a hook for doing it on file saving time afaik,
> > git-clang-format will clean u
ew.qt-project.org/#/c/233050/
Cheers,
Frederik
On mandag 18. juni 2018 11.04.33 CEST Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as part of the closing ceremony of this year's Qt Contributors' Summit we
> agreed to start using clang-format, to have fewer discussions around coding
On tirsdag 19. juni 2018 17.51.28 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday, 19 June 2018 02:34:09 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
> > Currently, we only merge from 5.11 to dev, so I hope this won’t be too
> > bad.
> > But we could of course also run the tool over both branches.
>
> I have right now 149 chan
Hi all,
as part of the closing ceremony of this year's Qt Contributors' Summit we
agreed to start using clang-format, to have fewer discussions around coding
style and rather focus on the actual code.
I have not yet thought about all angles, how to best implement this, here are
some notes:
We
On onsdag 2. mai 2018 09.29.18 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> 8 out of 8 integrations attempted in both qtbase/dev and qtbase/5.11
> yesterday resulted in
>
> FAIL! : tst_QTabWidget::paintEventCount() Compared values are not the same
> Actual (tab2->count): 2
> Expected (1) : 1
>
On mandag 16. april 2018 11.35.28 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Keeping release tags is OK for me. Motivation behind my proposal was to stop
> planning other release dates than FF & final target. Currently we are
> trying to estimate also alpha, beta and RC release dates and it seems to
> c
+1
Cheers,
Frederik
(And a big thank you to both Oliver and Maurice for cleaning up all kinds of
provisioning stuff on Windows lately!)
On mandag 9. april 2018 14.17.34 CEST Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As some might have recognized my focus inside the Qt Company has shifted
> from Wi
I restarted the sanity bot just now, please give it a few minutes to catch up
on your changes :)
Cheers,
Frederik
On onsdag 4. april 2018 10.28.15 CEST Liang Qi wrote:
> When Qt Sanity Bot is on vacation, here is the temporary solution, click
> "Review" button, unfold the "Sanity-Review" section
A big +1 from me as well :)
Cheers,
Frederik
On onsdag 21. mars 2018 12.33.06 CET Sérgio Martins wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Albert has been a long time contributor to KDE and Qt and very well
> known in the community.
>
> His dashboards speak for himself, with many bugs fixed:
> (For some reason past
Hello all,
in 2014 we agreed to make the release team in The Qt Company approvers for the
Qt Project to enable them to work efficiently.
Since then we had Aapo join the team. Aapo is working hard on improving Coin
and getting all our changes through CI smoothly. Sadly he doesn't have many
comm
+1 he's also getting his hands dirty with flaky tests and making things work in
general :-)
Cheers,
Frederik
From: Simon Hausmann
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 10:36
Subject: [Development] Nominating Ville Voutilainen as approver
To: development@qt-project.org
Hi,
I would like to nominate Vil
On onsdag 14. februar 2018 12.22.34 CET Benjamin TERRIER wrote:
> 2018-02-13 17:22 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira :
> > On terça-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2018 04:13:20 PST Frederik Gladhorn
wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The Qt Project has been accepted
de 2018 04:13:20 PST Frederik Gladhorn
wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Qt Project has been accepted as mentor organization for GSoC. Yay!
> > https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/organizations/5388456415461376/
>
> That reads "The Qt Company", not "The
Hi all,
The Qt Project has been accepted as mentor organization for GSoC. Yay!
https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/organizations/5388456415461376/
We now should collect ideas for projects that students could work on, we
started here:
https://wiki.qt.io/Google_Summer_of_Code/2018/Project_Ideas
F
, it will still be part of Qt releases for the time being.
This was to check what we have left to do to allow a happy transition and
prepare and nudge everyone else to move to Controls 2.
Cheers,
Frederik
On onsdag 7. februar 2018 13.48.21 CET Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
Hi all,
It should come as no big surprise that we are not working much on Qt Quick
Controls 1.
After some discussions inside The Qt Company, we concluded that it would make
sense to clarify the situation.
We see the value Controls 1 provides - more platform native styling - but it
comes at a hi
Hi all,
I just pushed a QUIP that I hope captures some of our philosophy and ideas
behind the Qt Project when it comes to contributing to Qt. I didn't discuss it
with many people yet, so it may be controversial. I'd like to get feedback of
course :)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/217216
On mandag 15. januar 2018 14.52.29 CET Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would like to nominate Adam for approver status. He has been developing
> with Qt for more than a decade and has been working on Qt and Qt 3D studio
> full time for about a year. I fully trust him to review changes thoroug
number.
Cheers,
Frederik
On torsdag 7. desember 2017 14.53.06 CET Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've lately been discussing with a few people in The Qt Company about our
> versioning.
> Historically it was a good idea to not couple Qt Quick too tightly to
> gene
On torsdag 21. desember 2017 10.46.20 CET Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> > On onsdag 20. desember 2017 17.00.18 CET Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> >> I'm repeatedly getting this error:
> >>
> >> Failed to provision template 'qtci-linux-Ubuntu-16.04-x86_64-1-b46ac1':
> >> Failed repeatedly to launch buil
On fredag 22. desember 2017 09.17.47 CET Tony Sarajärvi wrote:
> Hi
>
> We ignore the results of PS1 scripts because A) We have bad scripts that try
> to remove folders that don't exists anymore (should be cleaned) and B) as
> your example said, if we enabled enforcing of them now, things would br
On onsdag 20. desember 2017 17.00.18 CET Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> I'm repeatedly getting this error:
>
> Failed to provision template 'qtci-linux-Ubuntu-16.04-x86_64-1-b46ac1':
> Failed repeatedly to launch build/test agent
This means it never actually did any work because it either didn't g
On fredag 15. desember 2017 20.04.33 CET Tuukka Turunen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I propose to remove support for QNX 6.6 from Qt 5.11 onwards.
Yes please, it has been a bit of a trouble maker every once in a while :)
For example not needing to patch a header file on the platform is a good thing.
Chee
Thanks for picking this up and working on it :)
Frederik
On onsdag 6. desember 2017 15.35.44 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dilluns, 4 de desembre de 2017, a les 15:16:16 CET, Albert Astals Cid va
>
> escriure:
> > El dilluns, 20 de novembre de 2017, a les 23:45:18 CET, Thiago Macieira va
> >
Hi all,
I've lately been discussing with a few people in The Qt Company about our
versioning.
Historically it was a good idea to not couple Qt Quick too tightly to general
Qt releases. There were quite some constraints and added flexibility was nice.
Qt Quick has matured a lot though, so I think
Hi all,
we've had a bunch of unfortunate small things piling up, so sadly Coin is down
right now. I expect it to be up tomorrow (so in roughly 10 hours from now)
assuming everything now goes smooth.
We use local disks to cache VMs running in our Open Nebula instance and found
that the machin
Hi,
I just moved the changes to dev. They fix P2s which is great, but in my opinion
we should target dev by default. If there is agreement that they should go to
other branches, we can move them again.
Cheers,
Frederik
On søndag 29. oktober 2017 20.45.53 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Sunday
Hi all,
I think this thread is valuable, let's all spin it into something positive
indeed. Let's discuss ways to make reviews nicer and faster indeed.
Sorry for the top posting, I have random thoughts that I'll simply write down
not directly responding to any of the points.
Please just forget a
On onsdag 4. oktober 2017 19.28.43 CEST Daniel Savi wrote:
> Thank you all for the helpful comments on my previous message.
>
> I think that I have now managed to amend my changes into one commit and
> may understand how to react on comments.
>
> While amending my commits I must somehow have push
I'm a bit split here, let's try to find some middle ground :)
I do think that we should always run with accessibility enabled and we don't
do that for a reason.
One thing to fix for linux accessibility is listening to the change signal on
for a11y being enabled or not. If I recall correctly list
OK, I'll create the repository, we can still merge several projects later as
seen fit.
Cheers,
Frederik
On fredag 1. september 2017 14.06.23 CEST Maurice Kalinowski wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Most of you might have noticed the IoT related discussion happening on this
> mailing list. If not, che
o hear about it.
Cheers,
Frederik
On mandag 31. juli 2017 15.19.00 CEST Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is mostly for your information. On Wednesday this week (most likely)
> we're making changes to Coin, potentially leading to some interruptions in
> integrations.
>
-Original Message-
> From: Development
> [mailto:development-bounces+laszlo.agocs=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
> Frederik Gladhorn Sent: mandag 31. juli 2017 15.19
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Coin infrastructure changes
>
> Hi all,
>
>
1 - 100 of 334 matches
Mail list logo
