Re: [Development] New survey roll-out on doc.qt.io

2024-05-02 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, > Thanks for the information, > > it took me a while to notice it was a banner, > so for anyone wondering, here's the direct link: > https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/M59K58P Note the banner has the current page name as an URL parameter, which presumably gets stored alongside with the survey r

Re: [Development] Behavior-changing bugfixes in patch-level releases

2023-07-12 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, > We do generate release notes for patch release, i.e. > https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtreleasenotes.git/about/qt/6.5.1/release-note.md > where this particular change is included in the “Important Changes” > section: > https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtreleasenotes.git/about/qt/6.5.1/release-note.md

Re: [Development] Help me, check bug Qt topic 142770, very urgent!

2023-02-14 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:38:43AM +0100, g.scarpe...@u-tech.it wrote: > Can you help me to resolve the problem illustrated in the discussion > with topic 142770 ? This is a community mailinglist, which is the wrong place to get "very urgent" help with a non-public bug. Most people here (me i

Re: [Development] Licensing of qtbase

2022-07-13 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, (The usual "I am not a lawyer" disclaimer applies.) On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 12:14:27PM +0200, Felix Crazzolara wrote: > I would like to use Qt for a personal project. In my project, I use a > relatively small part of Qt and I think that the components of QtBase here > https://github.com/qt/qt

Re: [Development] Changes to Freenode's IRC

2021-05-26 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:17:49PM +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > While Freenode won't shut down tomorrow morning, this still raises some > questions whether Qt wants to keep its community there or move to another > network. Well, turns out it did shut down some channels e

Re: [Development] Moving IRC from Freenode to Libera.Chat, voting thread

2021-05-26 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 03:06:28AM +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > This is EXCLUSIVELY asking whether to transfer the official IRC presence of > Qt Project channels from Freenode (current) to Libera.Chat. +1. I'll answer to the other thread with some context. Florian --

Re: [Development] off the list

2020-11-27 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 08:45:02AM -0500, w wrote: > I don't know how I got on this list but someone better take me off it Every mail you get from this mailinglist has a footer: > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development At

Re: [Development] Issues with latest Qt6 snapshot on Windows

2020-07-24 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:19:40AM -0400, Tristan Millns wrote: > Take me off this list. Every mail you get from the list has a footer, with a link to the lists website: Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development You can uns

[Development] QtWebEngine and Qt 6 (was: Re: Can your module be included in Qt 6?)

2020-06-26 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:53:55AM +, Lars Knoll wrote: > As you can see, the scope of 6.0 will be reduced compared to 5.15. So now that it's official that QtWebEngine won't be part of Qt 6.0: What will that mean for security upgrades (i.e. updates of the underlying Chromium) for open s

Re: [Development] Qt Multimedia as Add-on in Qt 6

2020-05-22 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 02:54:24PM -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > On 22/05/2020 13.43, Jason H wrote: > > How about I just pay - which my company already does? The lagging mobile > > support has us considering moving away from Qt. I think this decision > > would confirm our direction and only hast

Re: [Development] Maintainers, your action needed; Qt 5.15.0 Changes Files

2020-04-20 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:42:37AM +, Fabian Kosmale wrote: > webengine is on page 2 as far as I can tell. Ah, I didn't see the page switcher. Nevermind then, my bad! Florian -- m...@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) | https://www.qutebrowser.org https://bruhin.software/ | https://github

Re: [Development] Maintainers, your action needed; Qt 5.15.0 Changes Files

2020-04-20 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 09:44:01AM +, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Hi, > Initial ones here: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/message:%2522Add+changes+file+for+Qt+5.15.0%2522 > > Please finalize asap,we should get these in before RC (which is coming at the > end of April) Is it intended that

Re: [Development] GitHub Pull requests

2020-03-13 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:51:31PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > I also need two CIs so I can test on just three OSes. Can you elaborate on that? I assume those are Linux, macOS and Windows? Pretty much all big CI providers I can think of (Travis CI, AppVeyor, GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines) s

Re: [Development] GitHub Pull requests

2020-03-10 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:08:39PM +, Zacruzin via Development wrote: > Please remove me from this email chain.Thank you! On the bottom of every mail you find a footer, liking to the website for this mailinglist: > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-

Re: [Development] (no subject)

2020-01-31 Thread Florian Bruhin
Emily, Jenifer, Every post to this list has a link to the list information page in the footer: On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:02:25PM +, Emily Kaizer wrote: > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development You can unsubscribe at the bott

Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering

2020-01-30 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:22:04PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > On 29/01/2020 17.13, Konstantin Shegunov wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:55 PM Matthew Woehlke wrote: > >> We need more open-source-meets-kickstarter... > > > > ehm, Patreon? > > Aside from issues with Patreon's reputation,

Re: [Development] Qt 5.13 & 5.14 add device-independent pixels to device-dependent

2020-01-30 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 07:14:50PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > I don't know what makes KMail different. I thought it was the use of a > qtwebengine window, but the qtwebengine examples seem to work fine. FWIW I've had issues (and so had other qutebrowser users) with context menus appearing in

Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering

2020-01-27 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 04:00:48PM +, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > After the change every release of Qt will look like a non-lts release for > open-source users. Think of Qt 5.14 as an example. It was released in > December. Today it received the first patch release. There will be more > befor

Re: [Development] Updated high-DPI support for Qt 5.14

2019-09-16 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 07:43:29AM +, Paul Tvete wrote: > On Friday, 13 September 2019 17:14:32 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > What happened to QT_AUTO_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTOR and QT_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTORS? > > QT_AUTO_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTOR was deprecated in 2016. The recommended > replacem

Re: [Development] Save the date: Qt Contributors Summit 2019 is 19th - 21st November in Berlin

2019-09-09 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey Tuukka, On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 11:23:28AM +, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > We are working on getting the registration open in the coming weeks as well > as more details of the planned structure. I don't mean to be pushy, but is there any chance you could share a more exact location already, if

Re: [Development] Gerrit is back / email template changed

2019-05-28 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 02:17:19PM +, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > If someone has other ideas, we can discuss them! On a related note - I'm a bit confused about the ellipsis in the subject. Why "Change in ...qtgamepad[5.12.4]:" and not just "Change in qtgamepad[5.12.4]:"? Florian -- https://w

[Development] Proposal: Using Gerrit for new approver proposals?

2019-05-20 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, As someone who's following this list but not working at the Qt Company, I find the stream of "+1" emails when there's a new proposal for approval rights for someone a bit noisy :) What about using Gerrit to do so? I'm not sure how the repository would look (probably just text files with the p

Re: [Development] Changes planned for the online installer

2019-03-25 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 07:22:59AM +, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > This would be a good opportunity to recommend everyone to contact your local > "ftp server" providers and ask if they could mirror Qt. We do not have any > mirror in Australia, for example. We do have quite nice amount of mirrors, >

Re: [Development] About our CI update notifications

2018-03-15 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:26:21AM +, Tony Sarajärvi wrote: > How does this sound to you recipients of these e-mails? Enough or would this > be excess spam to some degree? That sounds like useful information to me. However, I'm wondering: Would it be possible to display some kind of ann

Re: [Development] Qt branches & proposal how to continue with those

2018-01-29 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 02:32:58PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Simon Hausmann wrote: > > In the light of that, I think it would be better to keep the LTS branches > > open longer and stop doing patch releases for minor releases that are not > > LTS. > > -1 from a distro packager perspective. LTS

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.10 beta 4 released

2017-11-10 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, (not sure which ML this fits on, so I removed releasing@ - please Cc me on replies as I only get development@ as digest) On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:01:17PM +, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Current plan is to release Qt 5.10 rc next Thu as planned so please make sure > all blockers from blocker

Re: [Development] Nominating Viktor Engelmann for Approver Status

2017-07-11 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:25:21AM +, Simon Hausmann wrote: > I'd like to propose Viktor for approver status. Since August last year he's > been contributing to QtWebEngine full-time. Based on my experience talking to > him and working with him, I trust him to review changes thoroughly and >

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back

2016-06-06 Thread Florian Bruhin
* Lars Knoll [2016-06-07 06:38:35 +]: > Ok, in this case a separate repo is maybe a better strategy. > WebKitQt (as Allan proposed) might be a good name in this case :) I don't want to start any bike-shedding here, but if there's a QtWebKit and a WebKitQt and those are *basically* different v

Re: [Development] QT development needed

2015-12-15 Thread Florian Bruhin
* Jim Stracka [2015-12-15 13:44:17 -0800]: > I have an iOS App that I need written in QT for porting to other platforms. > > the iOS App is "StrackaLine" This list is for development *of* Qt itself. As for your question, I suggest you take a look at Qt's partners: http://www.qt.io/partners/ Fl

Re: [Development] New Qt5.6 Beta snapshot available

2015-12-14 Thread Florian Bruhin
* anton [2015-12-14 19:11:15 +0100]: > So if I understand right, > in a Qt Widgets Application I can no more embed > a Html/Browser component anymore. You can use QtWebEngine instead which is the successor of QtWebKit, and based on Chromium: http://wiki.qt.io/QtWebEngine Florian -- http://ww

Re: [Development] toLower() vs. toCaseFolded()

2015-12-09 Thread Florian Bruhin
* Marc Mutz [2015-12-09 12:20:36 +0100]: > On Wednesday 09 December 2015 10:57:21 Florian Bruhin wrote: > > * Marc Mutz [2015-12-09 11:54:54 +0100]: > > > Hi, > > > > > > http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.html#toCaseFolded is very vague on what > >

Re: [Development] toLower() vs. toCaseFolded()

2015-12-09 Thread Florian Bruhin
* Marc Mutz [2015-12-09 11:54:54 +0100]: > Hi, > > http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.html#toCaseFolded is very vague on what case > folding actually _is_ and how it's different from toLower(). > > Can someone please tell me the difference and why toCaseFolded() exists in > the > first place? Is i

Re: [Development] [QML] Need advice on frontend architecture

2015-11-18 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, * Ronan Jouchet [2015-11-18 10:46:06 -0500]: > I recently joined a nascent QML project with the objective to bring it from > the "working prototype" stage to something maintainable and efficient. > > [...] This list is for development *of* Qt itself, not *with* it. You probably want to pos

Re: [Development] How does mktime() handle DST transitions ?

2015-11-05 Thread Florian Bruhin
* André Somers [2015-11-05 13:10:33 +0100]: > Op 5-11-2015 om 00:06 schreef Kevin Kofler: > >Welbourne Edward wrote: > >>I'm looking into QTBUG-49008 and need to work out how diverse > >>implementations of mktime handle DST transitions: at one end of the year > >>there's a gap (where 1:59 is follo

Re: [Development] P1 statistics

2015-10-20 Thread Florian Bruhin
* Çağdaş Kayra Akman [2015-10-21 00:42:49 +0300]: > After being bitten by some showstopper bugs in the last few Qt releases, I > have decided to gather some P1 statistics. I thought you might find the > numbers interesting. Are you aware of the reports JIRA can generate[1]? Might make this kind o

Re: [Development] Enhancement to QIODevice?

2015-09-14 Thread Florian Bruhin
* Andrzej Ostruszka [2015-09-14 12:25:20 +0200]: > From now on I'll talk about QIODevice only since QSerialPort is > inheriting from it for the bulk of functionality (and this could also > benefit QIODevice). > > Since '\n' is just hardcoded in QIODevice (actually in buffer used in > its priv

Re: [Development] QString behavior change

2015-07-31 Thread Florian Bruhin
* Kobus Jaroslaw [2015-07-31 07:46:07 +]: > If you say not to differentiate empty and null states, some questions arise: > 1) Why we have isNull and isEmpty at the same time? > 2) Why their implementations are different? > 3) What would be the advice on what to use in general: isNull of isEmpt

Re: [Development] date/time adjust for (auto) testing

2015-06-03 Thread Florian Bruhin
* André Somers [2015-06-03 08:38:48 +0200]: > We have applications that use the current date and time at places spread > around the code. For normal operations, that works very nicely. However, > we find that for (auto) testing, it would be very convenient if we could > trick the application in

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.2 "RC" packages available for your testing

2015-05-18 Thread Florian Bruhin
* Roland Winklmeier [2015-05-18 15:24:02 +0200]: > Hi All, > > I was trying to install the Qt 5.4.2 mingw491 RC package > (qt-opensource-windows-x86-mingw491_opengl-5.4.2_2015-05-04_23-23-12-132.exe) > but the installation failed. See attached screenshot (Unfortunately its > German Language - I d

Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Qt 5.4.2 release coming

2015-04-21 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi René, * René J.V. Bertin [2015-04-21 21:19:43 +0200]: > On Tuesday April 21 2015 10:07:49 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > Either they've been putting up with it or they've never noticed. Either > > way, > > that makes the bug not critical for a patch release. > > Possibly. > > I've just trie

Re: [Development] Deprecating modules with 5.5

2015-03-18 Thread Florian Bruhin
* Knoll Lars [2015-03-18 07:31:00 +]: > On 18/03/15 07:44, "Bo Thorsen" wrote: > > >Den 17-03-2015 kl. 23:45 skrev Thiago Macieira: > >> On Tuesday 17 March 2015 17:14:38 Jan Kundrát wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 08:33:46 CET, Knoll Lars wrote: > * Qt WebKit > [...] > >>> > >