There are still some very large enterprise users running on vc2008 build
systems. Would this mean that all hope for building new releases on vc2008
would be lost, or that it just may take more effort than normal? As it
stands, I had to apply some manual fixes to get 5.1 to build with vc2008,
but it
Would someone familiar with widgets please kindly review this patch or
suggest an alternative fix. I'm happy to update the patch if a better
solution exists. This regression is preventing my company from moving from
Qt4 to Qt5.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,72939
__
Behalf
> Of Chris Colbert
> Sent: 6. desember 2013 02:46
> To: Olivier Goffart
> Cc: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] What's the magic incantation for developing
> effectively from the Qt git repo?
>
> > I was able to get things to build a
de dezembro de 2013 15:03:26, Chris Colbert wrote:
> > Is there a line missing from Option A, just after the line for ?
>
> This specific compiler did not output anything for this case.
>
> That case was a misuse of a macro. Here's another example, where the
> problem
>
Is there a line missing from Option A, just after the line for ?
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> Just a quick poll: which order do you think is more intuitive?
>
> Option A:
> qobjectdefs.h:69:20: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘protected’
> # defin
I had the same issue recently. It was because my qtdeclarative module (and
maybe others) was not built on 'stable'. I corrected by ensuring all
submodules were checked out to 'stable' where possible, or 'master'
otherwise.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Nurmi J-P wrote:
> On 07 Dec 2013, at 1
same thing the build bot is building against.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Nicolás Alvarez
wrote:
> 2013/12/5 Chris Colbert :
> > In the broader sense, if the Gerrit only merges to 'stable' once the
> build
> > succeeds and (presumably) tests pass, what's th
#x27; once the build
succeeds and (presumably) tests pass, what's the reasoning behind not
having qt5.git default the submodules to the 'stable' branch?
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Sunday 01 December 2013 13:53:50 Chris Colbert wrote:
> > I
I recently had a change-set merged which fixed the WA_StaticContents flag
on Windows. However, when I update my git repo according to the advice on
the website:
1. git pull
2. git submodule sync
3. git submodule update --recursive
I get a checkout which does not include my recent chang
