Re: [Development] [QIODevice]How to correctly treat/understand of the documentation?

2014-04-22 Thread Carlos Duclos
> Hi Thiago, Kuba, > > >> It should support the same waitForBytesWritten() and waitForReadyRead() that >> QAbstractSocket and QProcess have. Those are blocking. >Yes, QSerialPort does it (at least tries to do). :) >>Let's make sure we distinguish blocking from buffered. It's quite ok for >>QSeri

Re: [Development] [QIODevice]How to correctly treat/understand of the documentation?

2014-04-18 Thread Carlos Duclos
>Hi. > Hi again, Disclaimer. I don't work for Digia and I have never worked for Digia. I did work for Trolltech and Nokia though. >I once again fluently look source codes of Qt and I see that the only one >I/O class which supports a buffered mode is QTcpSocket (i.e. >QAbstractSocket in buffere

Re: [Development] [QIODevice]How to correctly treat/understand of the documentation?

2014-04-17 Thread Carlos Duclos
Hi, I'm not sure I understand your question so I'll reply according to what I understood. QIODevice is a generic interface and as such has to provide an interface that works well with different ways of doing things. What seems to confuse you is the possibility of doing buffered communications

Re: [Development] Disabling exception support in QtCore?

2013-10-03 Thread Carlos Duclos
(sorry for jumping in the middle of the discussion) >Quoting style guides that apply for applications can by definition not >contain reasoning for library writers. Apps live in their own little >dream world and can play with the compiler flags anyway they wish. They >only target one App, after