Re: [Development] wec2013 build fails with qt 5.6 beta in dbus.

2015-12-22 Thread Bornemann Joerg
On Monday 21 December 2015 21:58:46 Gunnar Roth wrote: > It's an unfortunate side effect of the configure.exe changes that enable > QtDBus > on all platforms. The code does work on Windows CE, but you have to figure out > why windows.h got included when it shouldn't have or tell it to stop > #def

Re: [Development] Q_OBJECT and "override"

2015-06-04 Thread Bornemann Joerg
> 1) Add "override" (or rather Q_DECL_OVERRIDE) to the definition of > Q_OBJECT *and* all QObject-derived classes in Qt. [...] > 2) Remove "override" from all QObject-derived classes in Qt. [...] > 3) Explicitly disable the warning in the clang mkspecs. [...] > 4) Let users deal with the problem b

Re: [Development] Qt Platform Extras

2013-02-25 Thread Bornemann Joerg
Hi Sascha, My point is that we cannot know whether we'll have to encode the platform in a function name again in the future, in which case we'll have functions with and without the platform in their name. Your point is that this won't ever happen. We can just avoid this risk of an inconsistent f

Re: [Development] Summary of renaming changes

2012-10-21 Thread Bornemann Joerg
Hi Thiago, > >This *is* the problem of Linux distributions. FHS doesn't cover this > > problem properly and this is the point where it should be fixed. > >You're making life harder for every platform - not only Linux - by > > fixing their problem. > > You may argue that case, but they'll