On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On terça-feira, 30 de abril de 2013 08.54.31, Samuel Rødal wrote:
>> A good reason for using the
>>
>> Foo()
>> : x(0)
>> , y(0)
>
> This is extremely ugly and should be discouraged.
If it is about the sum of all opinions, I agre
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
>> Based on that and without an answer from Oswald which revision is
>> currently in preparation within the winrt branch, I'd suggest to go
>> for the latest Chrome related branch, which would be chrome_m27:
>
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
>> (I went ahead and posted a question on the ANGLE ML asking which
>> 'stable' revision they would suggest to ship with Qt 5.1.)
>
> I got the
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
> (I went ahead and posted a question on the ANGLE ML asking which
> 'stable' revision they would suggest to ship with Qt 5.1.)
I got the following reply on the ANGLE ML:
--
Trunk is generally pretty stable unless a
In light of the recent mentioning of gcc's switch to DWARF4 from
DWARF2 with version 4.8, which should help get down the size of debug
builds, I am very much for giving the 4.8.0 option a try.
Cheers,
Axel
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-pr
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:44:13PM +0100, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
>> P.S. this is not necessarily an offer to do the upgrade myself (I
>> don't even have enough space to build qt on my windows partition right
&g
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> qtbase:
> ANGLE (*)
If I followed this thread sufficiently, it seems as if no one has yet
made a statement about the update of ANGLE. I just remembered that a
couple of weeks ago I came across this warning message when running
some
Hi,
sorry if this is a boring/stupid/old question (I have not found any
related discussion): Why is the installed mingw version of the (5.0.1)
SDK more than 3 times the size (>3.5GB) of the msvc version?
It obviously boils down to the question why especially the debug dlls
are so much bigger (lik
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
>> 2 c) if vs. while lines seem obviously inconsistent
>>
>> if (test == true
>> && 1 == 0) // 8 spaces == 4 relative to the '('
>
> This is a special case because of a {
>
> If you write:
> if (test == true
> && 1
With the trailing whitespace issue pretty much fixed, the next step is
eliminating leading tabs. A few questions about that:
1) If in doubt, is it generally fair to assume that whatever
QtCreator's CTRL+i in the default built-in Qt coding style does, is
the way to go?
2) Especially continuation l
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:38:31AM +0100, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
>> I'd say in terms of Lars's worries about having automatic checks in
>> place before attacking whitespace issues, there should not be any
&g
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> it went to the trash because the idea was not liked back then. the winds
> appear to have changed meanwhile.
That is a pitty. Given, that I already spent a bunch of hours looking
into this, I hope you are right (about the winds of chang
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:34:54PM +0100, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
>> I thought splitting by type first and potentially by directory second
>> if it is too big still, would be best because it reduces the burden on
>&g
>> 3. How to best split up patches from that category? e.g. fixing all
>> "if(...){" -> "if (...) {" occurrences in qtbase would be a rather
>> large patch (I have it half done)
>> a) split that up based on "manageable" subdirectories?
>>
> yes, and that only for easy recovery from merge conflict
Hi,
sitting in front of my keyboard after midnight and being in the mood
of killing some time with brain-dead typing, I came up with this:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,50652 patch. During my
recent first adventures as a Qt 'contributor' I learned that fixing
white space problems 'on t
15 matches
Mail list logo
