Re: [Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types

2017-05-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
marc.mutz wrote: > On Tuesday 23 May 2017 00:48:53 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Then we are right now concluding this kind of change should not be in that > > part of the QUIP. > > The QUIP gives an _algorithm_ to categorise SiCs, it's not a listing. There's > a list, yes. It's called _examples_. > >

Re: [Development] A new approach for Qt main()

2016-12-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
Whatever the problem is, I think we should try hard to have a solution that 1. does not use macros and 2. that does not optically change the int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { QApplication app(argc, argv)... } stanza. Macros look and feel ugly and outdated in contemporary C++, are harder to de

[Development] Qt API consistency (was: Re: unique_ptr vs. QSharedPointer)

2016-05-03 Thread Andre Poenitz
I'd like another question be answered before the discussion on yet another unsystematic use of yet another language or library feature starts: How important is API consistency for Qt today? Andre' ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.