Re: [Development] Updated high-DPI support for Qt 5.14

2019-09-26 Thread Allan Jensen
On Thursday, 26 September 2019 09:29:10 CEST Shawn Rutledge wrote: > KDE also needs to set env variables to get correct behavior, right? Which > ones does it do right? Which ones are wrong or unnecessary in 5.14? KDE sets the Qt environment variables to set the right scaling. GNOME has their ow

Re: [Development] Allow to do parallel integration (was: Proposal: New branch model)

2019-01-30 Thread Allan Jensen
On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 13:38:46 CET Jedrzej Nowacki wrote: > On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 11:48:40 AM CET Allan Jensen wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 11:19:07 CET Edward Welbourne wrote: > > > > > Jedrzej Nowacki (30 January 2019 11:08) > >

Re: [Development] Allow to do parallel integration (was: Proposal: New branch model)

2019-01-30 Thread Allan Jensen
On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 11:19:07 CET Edward Welbourne wrote: > Jedrzej Nowacki (30 January 2019 11:08) > > > Mårten pointed out that we can check for conflicts up front. Not only > > against HEAD of the target branch, but also against all build branches. > > That is even nicer as there is no

Re: [Development] Branch for Qt 6

2019-01-15 Thread Allan Jensen
On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 14:00:50 CET Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > On 15 Jan 2019, at 13:52, Lars Knoll wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> On 15 Jan 2019, at 13:44, Kari Oikarinen wrote: > >> > >> An alternative way of seeing (and perhaps handling) is in the same way as > >> we handle feature bra

Re: [Development] Branch for Qt 6

2019-01-15 Thread Allan Jensen
On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 12:22:11 CET Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > On 15 Jan 2019, at 12:13, Allan Jensen wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 12:06:17 CET Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > > >>> On 15 Jan 2019, at 11:54, Lars Knoll wrote: > >>>

Re: [Development] Branch for Qt 6

2019-01-15 Thread Allan Jensen
On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 12:06:17 CET Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > On 15 Jan 2019, at 11:54, Lars Knoll wrote: > > > > Ok, guess I misunderstood a bit. My idea was to keep ‘dev’ for 5.x > > development and ‘qt6’ for Qt 6 related development. At some point (when > > 5.15 is branched) we’d basical