Hi,
As Jani explained in another mail, the fact that something does not block a
release does not mean it's considered unimportant. We want to be as close as
possible to a time-based release schedule, which means that if a new release
does not regress and is an improvement to most users, it's be
Hi,
Oops! That's supposed to be QTBUG-38256.
Sorry about that!
I see that Thiago has removed the bug ID from the changelog, which is good
enough I think. Thanks for catching this :)
-- Eskil
Fra:
development-bounces+eskil.abrahamsen-blomfeldt=theqtcompany@qt-project.org
[mailto:developm
rinnelig melding-
Fra: Cornelius Hald [mailto:h...@icandy.de]
Sendt: 6. september 2013 16:15
Til: Abrahamsen-Blomfeldt Eskil
Kopi: development@qt-project.org
Emne: Re: [Development] WebView for Android on track for Qt 5.2?
On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 10:41 +0200, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote:
Fra: djsz...@archlinux.us [mailto:djsz...@archlinux.us] På vegne av Laszlo Papp
Sendt: 11. januar 2013 20:14
Til: BogDan
Kopi: Pau Garcia i Quiles; Abrahamsen-Blomfeldt Eskil; Felipe Crochik;
development@qt-project.org
Emne: Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?
On Fri, Jan 11,
er than Qt. Ideally, you should have to accept as few compromises
as possible when using Qt for your app.
-- Eskil
-----Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Bache-Wiig Jens
Sendt: 11. januar 2013 22:43
Til: Abrahamsen-Blomfeldt Eskil
Kopi: development@qt-project.org
Emne: Re: [Development] Proposal: Addin
