Hi,
For a while now we had a slightly weird branching situation in qtqa,
where we had a master and a dev branch, and it was a bit unclear what is used
where.
Here's a summary of latest changes regarding that situation.
1) Since a few months, qt submodule integrations (qtbase, qtsvg, etc)
in t
David C. Partridge (25 October 2024 10:03) wrote:
> While I applaud the thought of using std::format where appropriate, I
> can't see what converting the existing tr() mechanism to that will
> gain Qt Development or Qt Users
This needn't be about Qt converting its translations to use std::format;
> Here's another one: formatting of floating point types.
>
> That's a hard pass on the Standard Library implementations. We already carry
> code for this in the form of libdoubleconversion, so unless we can ditch that
> in favour of the Standard Library content, we shouldn't use both, which would
Il 25/10/24 10:03, David C. Partridge ha scritto:
While I applaud the thought of using std::format where appropriate, I
can't see what converting the existing tr() mechanism to that will gain
Qt Development or Qt Users
One would be the compile-time check on the format strings and its
replaceme
Il 24/10/24 19:04, Edward Welbourne ha scritto:
Given that that does also substitute the relevant number into the
string, I offer:
tr("The apple(s) you bought cost %L1", n).arg(price);
where the number controlling the singular/plural choice isn't inserted
into the result, but something else
>> As for me, the standard really misses the customization points for standard
>> formatters. But I still think that we should try to use what it provides,
>> instead of inventing a completely custom implementation.
>
> Can you elaborate on what it misses?
For example, for QBA(V) work I'd really l
Il 24/10/24 18:23, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
On Thursday 24 October 2024 05:19:45 Pacific Daylight Time Giuseppe D'Angelo
via Development wrote:
Btw, where does the “tr” go? Is it going to be tr(std::format(…)) or
std::vformat(tr(…))?
In the former, we’d have to pass the value twice (once for
While I applaud the thought of using std::format where appropriate, I can't see
what converting the existing tr() mechanism to that will gain Qt Development or
Qt Users
David
-Original Message-
From: Development On Behalf Of Thiago
Macieira
Sent: 24 October 2024 18:13
To: development@
Hi,
following up on the Deprecation vs Compatibility discussion from
the Qt Contributor Summit [0], I implemented a macro that allows to mark
the APIs as deprecated and to-be-removed in the Next Major Release [1].
[0]: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2024_Deprecate
[1]: https://codereview.qt-project.org/
On Thursday 24 October 2024 09:54:43 Pacific Daylight Time Giuseppe D'Angelo
via Development wrote:
> > This is what I'm more worried about: telling the string-extraction tools
> > that don't really understand C++ that this is a string with plurals. I
> > don't know if they need to: is it acceptab
10 matches
Mail list logo
