Comment from peanut gallery,
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40856
> This code should produce the same results with -std=g++11 and -std=c++11
> I will not object to patches tweaking the condition and positively reviewed
> by fellow maintainers.
It sounds like the GCC maintainers
Hello list,
on behalf of the Qt Company, I would like to propose a new single-line
comment header for the Qt source code.
The syntax is:
// Qt-Security score:N reason:some-reason [labels:label1,label2]
The idea is to mark files with code where bugs are more likely to cause
security issues
On Tuesday 9 July 2024 03:33:16 GMT-7 Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
> We should really try to fix this before 6.8.0 (LTS).
I won't have time for QDataStream and especially QTextStream & QDebug, which
are required for QMetaType.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Principal
We should really try to fix this before 6.8.0 (LTS).
On 09.12.23 18:38, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday, 8 December 2023 18:51:19 PST Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
>> I think we need to mandate that if you want qint128 support, then you
>> must compile with gnu++NN, which is actually the def
