Hi!
We have branched '6.7.1' from '6.7' now. So from now on all changes targeted to
Qt 6.7.1 release must have 'Pick-to: 6.7.1' and '6.7' is for Qt 6.7.2. But
remember, please do not try to add anything nice-to-haves in '6.7.1' anymore;
we will take in only fixes for release blockers (+ of co
Qt 6.7 status
* Qt 6.7.1 preparations started
* First internal snapshot done, new one coming. The target is to make it
publicly available later this week
* Branching from '6.7' to '6.7.1' delayed , the target is to do the
branching Wed 24th of April
* The target is still
On 23.04.24 16:27, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
> Jannis is already approver, so he already has all the privileges as far as
> source code access is concerned. If we want to start doing background checks
> (and that’s a worthwhile discussion to have), we’d have to do so when
> nominating approvers,
From: Development on behalf of Frank
Meerkötter
>I would like to nominate Jannis Völker as
>the new maintainer.
>https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:jannis.voel...@basyskom.com
+1 from me and I have met Jannis and Frank :)
--
Alex
--
Developme
> On 23 Apr 2024, at 14:06, Marc Mutz via Development
> wrote:
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> On 23.04.24 13:16, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
>> I am going to step down as the maintainer of Qt OPC UA. I have not been
>> very active recently.
>
> Thanks for your work on QtOpcUa over the years!
>
>> I would like to
Hi Frank,
On 23.04.24 13:16, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
> I am going to step down as the maintainer of Qt OPC UA. I have not been
> very active recently.
Thanks for your work on QtOpcUa over the years!
> I would like to nominate Jannis Völker as
> the new maintainer.
>
> https://codereview.qt-p
Hi qt-devel,
I am going to step down as the maintainer of Qt OPC UA. I have not been
very active recently.
I would like to nominate Jannis Völker as
the new maintainer.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/owner:jannis.voel...@basyskom.com
Jannis is the most active contributor to the modul