On 6 Mar 2024, at 23:09, Axel Spoerl via Development
wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I hereby nominate Dr. Máté Barany as an approver for the Qt project.
Máté has been a valuable contributor and reviewer, providing sound code,
guidance and input.
As a reference, see his dashboard
here:https://coderev
+1
-Matti
From: Development on behalf of Timur
Pocheptsov via Development
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2024 3:11 AM
To: development@qt-project.org ; Axel Spoerl
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Dr. Máté Barany as an approver for the Qt
project
+1
Best rega
Hi!
We have branched '6.7.0' from '6.7' now. So from now on all changes targeted to
Qt 6.7.0 release must have 'Pick-to: 6.7.0' and '6.7' is for Qt 6.7.1. But
remember, please do not try to add anything nice-to-haves in '6.7.0' anymore;
we will take in only fixes for release blockers (+ of co
+1
Best regards,
Timur.
From: Development on behalf of Axel Spoerl
via Development
Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2024 11:09 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Nominating Dr. Máté Barany as an approver for the Qt
project
Dear Colleagues,
Dear Colleagues,
I hereby nominate Dr. Máté Barany as an approver for the Qt project.
Máté has been a valuable contributor and reviewer, providing sound code,
guidance and input.
As a reference, see his dashboard
here:https://codereview.qt-project.org/dashboard/1010490
I fully trust his advice,
Hi Volker!
> From: Volker Hilsheimer
> Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 10:40
> To: Kai Köhne
> Cc: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Extending qt_attribution.json files to mark
> provisioned components
>
>
>
>> On 4 Mar 2024, at 14:42, Kai Köhne via Development
>> wrot
The choice of where we use/allow `#pragma once` should not be coupled to
whether a header is considered public or not.
Let’s not create even more indirections and inference rules that one has to
keep in mind.
If we want to make it clearer if a header is public or not, let’s make it
explicit.
