Re: [Development] Can we remove recommendation against unnamed namespaces from Qt coding conventions?

2024-02-23 Thread apoenitz
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 09:49:17AM +, Jøger Hansegård via Development wrote: > >> [...] > >> Would an option be to change from: > >> > >>    Avoid the use of anonymous namespaces in favor of the static keyword > >>    if possible. A name localized to the compilation unit with static is > >>   

Re: [Development] Nominating David Redondo for approval status

2024-02-23 Thread Alex Blasche via Development
Congratulations to David, approver rights have been granted. -- Alex From: Development on behalf of David Edmundson Sent: Thursday, 1 February 2024 15:10 To: development Subject: [Development] Nominating David Redondo for approval status I would like

Re: [Development] Nominating Vlad Zahorodnii for approval status

2024-02-23 Thread Alex Blasche via Development
Congratulations to Vlad, Approver rights have been granted. -- Alex From: Development on behalf of David Edmundson Sent: Thursday, 1 February 2024 15:11 To: development Subject: [Development] Nominating Vlad Zahorodnii for approval status I would lik

Re: [Development] Can we remove recommendation against unnamed namespaces from Qt coding conventions?

2024-02-23 Thread Jøger Hansegård via Development
>> >>    Our Qt coding conventions ([1]https://wiki.qt.io/Coding_Conventions) >> >>    has a statement on the use of unnamed (anonymous) namespaces. As far as >> >>    I understand, this statement is now outdated. >> >> > [I'll assume we are talking about functions here.] >> >> Anonymous namespaces