[Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '6.5' to '6.5.3' done

Hi! We have branched '6.5.3' from '6.5' now. So from now on all changes targeted to Qt 6.5.3 release must have 'Pick-to: 6.5.3'. As usual staging in '6.5.3' is restricted to release team only and we will monitor incoming changes automatically. The target is to release Qt 6.5.3 during September.

Re: [Development] Need CMake help for QNX (release-critical)

On Thursday, 14 September 2023 04:42:48 PDT Jörg Bornemann via Development wrote: > That's a bug in the condition evaluator (QTBUG-117053), but we can work > around it: https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/503980 Thanks, Jörg! -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Clo

Re: [Development] qt6_add_shaders and static libraries

FYI we got everything to work for iOS/static linking by using the OUTPUT_TARGETS parameter as described, followed by target_link_libraries target_link_libraries(${target} PRIVATE ${output_targets}) And then in the source module, if the calling Q_INIT_RESOURCE(). (inside #ifdef QT_STATICPL

Re: [Development] Need CMake help for QNX (release-critical)

On 9/14/23 07:20, Thiago Macieira wrote: > If TEST_posix_shm = TRUE and TEST_posix_sem = TRUE and TEST_sysv_shm = FALSE > and TEST_sysv_sem = FALSE, why is ipc_posix not TRUE? That's a bug in the condition evaluator (QTBUG-117053), but we can work around it: https://codereview.qt-project.org/

Re: [Development] C++20 comparisons @ Qt (was: Re: C++20 @ Qt)

Hi, Sorry for being absent this discussion for the last months, but getting 6.6 in shape was more pressing than even fundamental 6.7 work. Whenever you want to add an operation to _all_ types in the C++, built-in, as well as user-defined one, you obviously cannot use something that only works