[Development] Codereview maintenance on Monday 7-Aug 5:00 am UTC

2023-08-01 Thread Jukka Jokiniva via Development
Hi all, There will be a maintenance break on the codereview.qt-project.org on Monday 7-Aug 5:00 am – 6:00 am UTC. The Gerrit version will be updated to 3.7.4 --Jukka Jokiniva, Gerrit Admin -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/develop

Re: [Development] What are differences/relations among CMake targets with "docs" word?

2023-08-01 Thread Eike Ziller via Development
Hi, prepare_docs runs qdoc with -prepare, generate_docs runs qdoc with -generate (depends on prepare_docs), html_docs is basically a synonym for generate_docs, qch_docs creates the QtHelp databases (.qch files) for Assistant/Qt Creator, and docs ist a target that depends on html_docs and qch_docs,

[Development] What are differences/relations among CMake targets with "docs" word?

2023-08-01 Thread Haowei Hsu
Hello, Qt Development Team. I noticed that there the following CMake targets with *"docs"* word in qt/qtbase: - *docs(_xxx)* - *generate_docs(_xxx)* - *html_docs(_xxx)* - *install_docs(_xxx)* - *install_html_docs(_xxx)* - *install_qch_docs(_xxx)* - *prepare_docs(_xxx)* - *

Re: [Development] C++20 comparisons @ Qt (was: Re: C++20 @ Qt)

2023-08-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 01:55:05 PDT Ivan Solovev via Development wrote: > > BTW, this needs to integrate with QEqualityOperatorForType and > > QLessThanOperatorForType in qmetatype.h. I don't think there's any work > > for > > you other than verifying. > > I was not even aware of them, thanks!

Re: [Development] Failed to build Qt6 Documentation from qt/qtbase sources?

2023-08-01 Thread Joerg Bornemann via Development
On 8/1/23 14:22, Haowei Hsu wrote: However, it turns out that there is an error in the Step 7: You're doing a prefix build [1] but you did not build & install before building the docs. The error indicates a missing file in the install prefix. Try a non-prefix build instead. Without configur

Re: [Development] C++20 comparisons @ Qt (was: Re: C++20 @ Qt)

2023-08-01 Thread Ivan Solovev via Development
> Every pair? Under what conditions do we need to implement heterogeneous > comparisons, outside of the primitives? Well, it was not a very precise wording from my side. What I mean is that we need to handle every class with existing relational operators. Which looks like a lot of work, and adding

Re: [Development] C++20 comparisons @ Qt (was: Re: C++20 @ Qt)

2023-08-01 Thread Edward Welbourne via Development
On Monday, 31 July 2023 02:36:41 PDT Ivan Solovev via Development wrote: >> Basically, what you suggest is that for every pair of comparable Qt >> types we would need to double the amount of work that we do - provide >> not only the helper functions for the macros, but also the overload >> for some