Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

2023-07-19 Thread Martin Storsjö
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday, 19 July 2023 08:46:27 PDT Cristian Adam via Development wrote: With this migration would should also switch to Universal CRT. The toolchain comes in both ucrt and ms

Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

2023-07-19 Thread Yang Fan
I believe the primary difference lies in the C and C++ Libraries. MINGW64 uses msvcrt and libstdc++, while CLANG64 employs ucrt and libc++. On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:22 AM Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Wednesday, 19 July 2023 18:55:34 PDT Yang Fan wrote: > > I wanted to point out that MSYS2 offe

Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

2023-07-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday, 19 July 2023 18:55:34 PDT Yang Fan wrote: > I wanted to point out that MSYS2 offers precompiled packages of Qt6 in four > different environments: CLANGARM64, MINGW64, CLANG64, and UCRT64. Is there any difference between mingw64 and clang64, aside from which compiler was used to comp

Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

2023-07-19 Thread Yang Fan
I wanted to point out that MSYS2 offers precompiled packages of Qt6 in four different environments: CLANGARM64, MINGW64, CLANG64, and UCRT64. In my opinion, simply switching among Qt's official precompiled packages and toolchains doesn't seem to carry significant benefits. Instead, learning how MS

Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

2023-07-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday, 19 July 2023 16:01:25 PDT Scott Bloom wrote: > > * Support for generating debug info in PDB format > > How useful is this? Does gdb support this format? If not, then you wouldn't > be able to debug stuff, meaning this is not a benefit at all. > > === > I haven't tried this

Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

2023-07-19 Thread Scott Bloom
> * Support for generating debug info in PDB format How useful is this? Does gdb support this format? If not, then you wouldn't be able to debug stuff, meaning this is not a benefit at all. === I haven't tried this, however, according to what I have read this enables you to build with

[Development] [Announce] Qt 6.5.2 Released

2023-07-19 Thread List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development via Announce via Development
Hi all, We have released Qt 6.5.2 today, please see https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-6.5.2-released-1 Big thanks to everyone involved! Best regards, Tarja Sundqvist Release Manager ___ Announce mailing list annou...@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.or

Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

2023-07-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday, 19 July 2023 08:46:27 PDT Cristian Adam via Development wrote: > Hi, > > we are thinking of migrating from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW. The ticket in > question is [QTBUG-107516] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM-MinGW - Qt Bug > Tracker TL;DR:

[Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

2023-07-19 Thread Cristian Adam via Development
Hi, we are thinking of migrating from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW. The ticket in question is [QTBUG-107516] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM-MinGW - Qt Bug Tracker For a while now we have a CI configuration testing with LLVM MinGW. The benefits of the L

[Development] New "In Review" workflow state in Jira

2023-07-19 Thread Alex Blasche via Development
Hi, During recent times we got more and more requests from developers to have an "In Review" status in Jira. The idea is to park tasks in this state while one waits for more feedback on gerrit. Whether you keep it in this state while you continue to actively incorporate review feedback or move