Hi,
I have a change[1] I made two years ago. People were adding another
people to reviewers as no one of them had knowledge to review the
change. Since some time people has just started ignoring pings. More
than two years has passed but the change is still there, with no votes
nor clear explanatio
Hi,
I've tried to summarize this thread, using my own observation on
existing use of [[nodiscard]] to fill in C++17 uses, in
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/meta/quips/+/486201
Let's discuss exact wording over in the Gerrit change and come back to
the ML for more fundamental questions, if
On 19.06.23 09:55, Ivan Solovev via Development wrote:
> > (*) That macro that does nothing until C++20 anyway, so I’d also add
> the support for the optional string-literal that C++20 also introduces..
>
> Our tests actually show that this macro provides an expected warning on
> most of the c
> (*) That macro that does nothing until C++20 anyway, so I’d also add the
> support for the optional string-literal that C++20 also introduces..
Our tests actually show that this macro provides an expected warning on most of
the compilers that we use in the CI, even in C++17 mode.
IIRC, in my
