> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of Ulf
> Hermann via Development
> Subject: Re: [Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in
> qt_attributions.json files
>
> YAML is really quite terrible. If we're going to switch, let's choose
> something
> else.
>
>
Qt 6.5 status
- Qt 6.5 beta3 preparations ongoing
* Content not frozen yet but target is to freeze it as soon as possible
* Target is to release Qt 6.5.0 beta3 at the beginning of next week
- Qt 6.5 API Change review mostly done, see
https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/topic:api-change-r
YAML is really quite terrible. If we're going to switch, let's choose
something else.
Basically, YAML is extremely complex, ambiguous, and incompatible
between different versions. See for example
https://ruudvanasseldonk.com/2023/01/11/the-yaml-document-from-hell for
an in-depth explanation.
On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 07:07:00 PST Kai Köhne via Development wrote:
> First, let's agree that JSON sucks for the task at hand. It doesn't have any
> explicit support for comments, and no support for multi-line strings
> (though our implementation tolerates this).
How about switching to YAML
Hi,
+1 to the approach suggested by Kai.
Having comments would be very helpful, but I do not think that we need a
separate comment field for each entry.
Best regards,
Ivan
From: Development on behalf of Kai Köhne
via Development
Sent: Tuesday, February 14,
Hi Eddy,
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Edward Welbourne via Development
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 3:14 PM
> To: Development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Support for *Notes and UpstreamFiles fields in
> qt_attributions.json files
>
> Hi all,
>
Hi all,
Having taken part in various third-party updates and felt a need to
leave notes for those who will do the same in future, I have run up
against JSON not having a comment format. To work round that, I propose
to allow some fields to be included in a qt_attribution.json file for
that purpos
Hi Florian ,
I send you my problem :
I am development my application with the qt 5.15 (c++ code) .The my
application is implement using objects are child of the QWidget class. Every
time that I open a child class connect the closing signal at the slot to parent
class to delete the ob
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:38:43AM +0100, g.scarpe...@u-tech.it wrote:
> Can you help me to resolve the problem illustrated in the discussion
> with topic 142770 ?
This is a community mailinglist, which is the wrong place to get
"very urgent" help with a non-public bug. Most people here (me i
Hello,
Can you help me to resolve the problem illustrated in the discussion with
topic 142770 ?
Name topic :
The touch screen events are block after deleteLater function
Best regards,
Gianmarco Scarpelli
[microtechsrl_1486503464_F.png]
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Dot
Hi all,
It seems there isn't that much support to change the release schedule frame so
let's keep the old one & plan new minor releases in March & September.
So my proposal for Qt 6.6 schedule is:
* Qt 6.6 Platform and Module freeze 19.5.2023
* Qt 6.6 Feature Freeze 2.6.2023
* Qt 6.6 Beta1 14.6.
11 matches
Mail list logo
