Benjamin TERRIER wrote:
> As much as I dislike The Qt Company unfriendly behaviour toward LGPL users
> and the fact that IMHO The Qt Company seems to be taking decisions that
> should be taken by the Qt Project,
This whole "open governance" thing is and has always been a PR farce. There
is nothin
Hi,
I'm currently trying to transform QML value types, such as font, rect,
size, etc, into something less random and more predictable. On that
occasion I'm wondering what semantics people actually expect from value
types.
One thing you have to know in advance is that QML has this internal
con
Hi,
Some of the 3rd party components we bundle in Qt are directly involved in code
paths that are designed to process untrusted data. Following up on the
situation with freetype [1] and the discussion we had during summer [2], it
would help know which of the 3rd party components we bundle toda
+1
definitely well deserved, to be honest I was not aware he is not a approver.
Br
Michal
From: Development on behalf of Allan
Sandfeld Jensen
Sent: Monday, 19 September 2022 16:51
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Nominating Szabolcs Dav
On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 01:34, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> Hi Tuuka,
>
> By that link I didn't mean QTBUG-102962 exactly, but 23 matching bugs for
> a single component (which is not even one of the top-wanted components).
> On vanilla 6.2.4, QCamera simply doesn't work on many Android devices. All
>
+1
I trust Szabolcs with his code and I can always rely on his advice when
I need help. He is putting a lot of effort into adding new features to
Qt WebEngine.
regards,
Peter
On 9/19/22 16:51, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose Szabolcs David as an Qt Project Approver.
D
