Re: [Development] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Could support for C be added to Qt?

2022-09-14 Thread samuel ammonius
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:16 PM Thiago Macieira wrote: > How about a wrapper to the wrapper? Why wrap a wrapper that wraps C++ when you can just wrap C++? Aside from the fact that it probably wouldn't be any easier, it would also start to add up the overhead of function calls. ___

Re: [Development] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Could support for C be added to Qt?

2022-09-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday, 14 September 2022 12:37:09 PDT samuel ammonius wrote: > Every language I tried generating from that file using SWIG was between 300 > and 3000 lines long. I think it's great for the languages it's made for, > but it can't generate C wrappers that are actually made to be used in C. > T

Re: [Development] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Could support for C be added to Qt?

2022-09-14 Thread samuel ammonius
Hi Mark, I tried SWIG, and It definitely can't be used for C. This is the interface file I tested it with: _ %module test class Test { public: Test(); Test(int); ~Test(); }; _ Every language I tried generating from that file using SWIG was betw

Re: [Development] Proposal to address "Ghost Maintainers"

2022-09-14 Thread Volker Hilsheimer
This change has now been submitted to the governance model, after several +1’s and no objections raised. Thanks! Volker > On 5 Sep 2022, at 16:36, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > > Hi, > > > Following the “Ghost Maintainer” discussion at the Qt Contributors Summit in > June [1] (non-conclusive