> To me trying to wrap the API is just a way to do things more complicated,
for
> the sake of making it more complicated.
The programs I was thinking would benefit from something like this in
particular
are the ones that have been built on top of C and GTK, and would maybe like
to
switch now that
>> There's a couple things I still haven't figured out though, like
>> constructors/destructors and templates. Are there solutions to these that
In C, constructors/destructors usually become alloc/free functions. C
has macros and code generation but these aren’t directly analogous to
templates.
I
On Samstag, 10. September 2022 00:05:10 CEST samuel ammonius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to contributing to Qt directly, but I've been trying to create
> external C bindings for Qt for a few months now. Since C and C++ are so
> similar, I've recently been thinking it may just be better to add C su
Hello,
I'm new to contributing to Qt directly, but I've been trying to create
external C bindings for Qt for a few months now. Since C and C++ are so
similar, I've recently been thinking it may just be better to add C support
directly to the Qt headers by checking for the __cplusplus macro.
The d
I've created a revert commit for 5.15, see
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/tqtc-qtbase/+/431686.
Best regards,
Sona
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Thiago Macieira
> Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 11:23 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re:
