On Monday, 23 May 2022 19:51:15 PDT 弓 长 wrote:
> Hi, I don't find one document of reason about the design, I found this
> patch: https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/177353 , apparently
> it was big endian before that.
> The reality is that little endian is more
> commonly used in local
Hi, I don't find one document of reason about the design, I found this patch:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/177353 , apparently it was big
endian before that.
The reality is that little endian is more commonly used in local environments,
so I wonder why we don't default to litt
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 9:24 AM Jörg Bornemann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just a heads-up, because we never announced this on this mailing list:
> we're in the process of switching Qt sources from traditional license
> headers to much more concise SPDX license expressions.
>
> Longer story here: https://w
Hi Samuel,
Thanks! It’s indeed been quite a ride, and I'd like to also thank you for being
there and all the work you’ve been doing for the community over the years.
Cheers,
Lars
> On 18 May 2022, at 10:51, Samuel Gaist wrote:
>
> Hi Lars,
>
> Thank you for the ride !
>
> The road has seen
Hi,
just a heads-up, because we never announced this on this mailing list:
we're in the process of switching Qt sources from traditional license
headers to much more concise SPDX license expressions.
Longer story here: https://www.qt.io/blog/switching-to-spdx
So far, the switch has been comp
