On Tuesday, 15 February 2022 07:54:07 PST Marc Mutz wrote:
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-100845
>
> The QWaylandBufferRef class has a very annoying bug in that its relational
> operators cannot compare `const` objects (only on the RHS). That's because
> these operators are implemented as
On Wednesday, 16 February 2022 00:53:41 PST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> [2]: Before you say "you could if you sign a few more NDAs and stuff",
> realize that by saying that you would be agreeing that normal The Qt
> Project people can't contribute to those LTS releases and only those that
> sign ext
Hi!
Please check if some 3rd party component needs to be updated for Qt 6.3
release. And of course, do needed updates now.
List of 3rd party components here:
https://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt6-6.3/licenses-used-in-qt.html
Tasks here: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-100895
br,
Jani
Hi all,
First beta releases from Qt 6.3 are already out so it is time to start keeping
translatable strings as it is. The official string freeze for Qt 6.3 will be in
effect Wed 23rd February 2022.
br,
Jani Heikkinen
Release Manager
___
Development ma
s/that the/that this is the only workable solution/
From: Marc Mutz
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 11:20 AM
To: Lars Knoll
Cc: Qt development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Development] Requesting forward BC exception for
QtWaylandCompositor in 6.2 and 5.15
Nop
Nope, doesn't work. I keep hitting a Clang 10 bug:
https://godbolt.org/z/z9K8fc5ce (works in Clang 11).
I think this is what I hit in the past, too, and Clang 10 will not let up until
that weird-const overload is gone. So the only way to fix it for Clang 10 is to
take the fwd-BC break and just
El dimarts, 15 de febrer de 2022, a les 19:58:05 (CET), Andreas Aardal Hanssen
va escriure:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022, at 19:46, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 15 February 2022 09:34:35 PST Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > 6.2 is an LTS release, is it not?
> >
> > Not from my point of view, it isn't.
Hi Lars,
> * Is there a work-around for the developers with the current state, e.g. by
> adding some casts?
There are two situations here:
* those that control the creation of the QWaylandBufferRef objects can just
choose to not make the LHS const, swapping RHS and LHS if need be (as all
On Mittwoch, 16. Februar 2022 01:21:16 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 February 2022 11:37:30 PST Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
>
> wrote:
> > First and foremost, does anyone know whether QtWayland is under any BC
> > promise at all?
>
> The question must be turned around: does an
Hi Marc,
Two questions:
* Is there a work-around for the developers with the current state, e.g. by
adding some casts?
* Could you add the missing operators inline, so they don’t add new symbols?
Cheers,
Lars
On 15 Feb 2022, at 16:54, Marc Mutz mailto:marc.m...@qt.io>>
wrote:
Hi,
https://bu
10 matches
Mail list logo
