Re: [Development] Proposing to move deploy tools to qtbase

> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Ulf Hermann > Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2021 3:23 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Proposing to move deploy tools to qtbase > > > I’m working on adding new CMake APIs for install support for Qt 6.3. >

Re: [Development] Proposing to move deploy tools to qtbase

Agreed, +1 Cheers, Tor Arne On 16 Nov 2021, at 15:23, Ulf Hermann mailto:ulf.herm...@qt.io>> wrote: I’m working on adding new CMake APIs for install support for Qt 6.3. As part of that, there will be conveniences for invoking the appropriate xxxdeployqt tool where available. At the moment, ma

Re: [Development] Proposing to move deploy tools to qtbase

On 2021 Nov 16, at 12:06, EXT Craig Scott mailto:craig.sc...@qt.io>> wrote: I’m working on adding new CMake APIs for install support for Qt 6.3. As part of that, there will be conveniences for invoking the appropriate xxxdeployqt tool where available. At the moment, macdeployqt and windeployqt

Re: [Development] Proposing to move deploy tools to qtbase

I’m working on adding new CMake APIs for install support for Qt 6.3. As part of that, there will be conveniences for invoking the appropriate xxxdeployqt tool where available. At the moment, macdeployqt and windeployqt live in qttools, whereas androiddeployqt lives in qtbase. I’d like to propos

Re: [Development] Proposing to move deploy tools to qtbase

+1 from me too, fwiw. Androiddeployqt was moved to qtbase already, some years ago, when it was needed to make testing in CI not require building other modules. Mårten From: Thiago Macieira Sent: tirsdag 16. november 2021 15:14 To: development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] Proposing to move deploy tools to qtbase

On Tuesday, 16 November 2021 03:06:55 PST EXT Craig Scott wrote: > Both macdeployqt and windeployqt are small and don’t depend on anything > other that QtCore (their tests do depend on QtTest as well). > > With feature freeze for 6.3 only a few weeks away, it would be good if we > could resolve th

Re: [Development] moc output from non-local tool build

On Tuesday, 16 November 2021 04:39:59 PST Marius Kittler wrote: > > Indeed. The proposal was how old that build can be. Can you count on the > > host Linux distribution being up-to-date enough to have N-1 or even N-3? > > Because you can't, then the point is moot. > > I am *not* worried about the

Re: [Development] moc output from non-local tool build

Am Mittwoch, 10. November 2021, 16:26:43 CET schrieb Thiago Macieira: > On Wednesday, 10 November 2021 03:29:15 PST Marius Kittler wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 9. November 2021, 19:59:29 CET schrieb Thiago Macieira: > > > On Friday, 5 November 2021 08:28:20 PST Scott Bloom wrote: > > > > Why wouldn’t th

[Development] Proposing to move deploy tools to qtbase

I’m working on adding new CMake APIs for install support for Qt 6.3. As part of that, there will be conveniences for invoking the appropriate xxxdeployqt tool where available. At the moment, macdeployqt and windeployqt live in qttools, whereas androiddeployqt lives in qtbase. I’d like to propose

Re: [Development] moc output from non-local tool build

On 11/15/21 5:41 PM, Marius Kittler wrote: Am Montag, 15. November 2021, 16:46:31 CET schrieben Sie: On Monday, 15 November 2021 05:52:46 PST Joerg Bornemann wrote: There's already a target called host_tools to build the necessary tools. An install target/component for it is missing though, see