A blog post [1] and the current doc snapshot [2] both say, "Clients that
still rely on missing functionality can include the private header
as a stopgap solution."
However, I just installed Qt 6.2.0 RC for Android and can't find
qtandroidextras_p.h anywhere. Are the blog and snapshot accurate?
On Friday, 17 September 2021 02:03:39 PDT Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
> The approver that gave the -2 not yielding to the maintainer giving a +2
> should be (and is, in my experience) such an exceptional situation that it
> deserves explicitly notifying the chief maintainer and gerrit admins. And
> pe
On 17 Sep 2021, at 10:51, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>> The Maintainer has the authority to ask the admins to remove it.
>> Indeed, a button - available only to the Maintainer(s) of the module
>> - would be a nice improvement to the process but, for the present at
>> least, that "button" is implement
> On 17 Sep 2021, at 10:51, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
> Chris Adams (17 September 2021 03:45) wrote:
>> My point being: maybe the "maintainers can override a -2" is a
>> "conceptual power" rather than a physical button in Gerrit, which
>> still requires the approver to take away their own -2 in t
Chris Adams (17 September 2021 03:45) wrote:
> My point being: maybe the "maintainers can override a -2" is a
> "conceptual power" rather than a physical button in Gerrit, which
> still requires the approver to take away their own -2 in that
> circumstance? (Obviously Gerrit admins can do it, but
Hi,
We have gotten a lot of valuable feedback on the Qt 6.2 pre-releases and the RC
looks very solid. There are always some things to fix, and now it is crucially
important to get all feedback quickly to the release team.
There is time to fix issues before the Qt 6.2.0 final, but that requires