Hi all,
These problems should be solved now; dependency update round is done for all
modules and qt5.git integration in 'dev' is ongoing
br,
Jani
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Fabian Kosmale
> Sent: torstai 16. syyskuuta 2021 17.57
> To: development@qt-projec
On Thursday, 16 September 2021 18:45:35 PDT Chris Adams wrote:
> My point being: maybe the "maintainers can override a -2" is a "conceptual
> power" rather than a physical button in Gerrit, which still requires the
> approver to take away their own -2 in that circumstance?
Correct.
--
Thiago Mac
Hi,
I'm not related at all to QBS development, but I am a maintainer of another
module or two (add-on modules like QtPIM, QMF), and I've never noticed an
"override review" button (similar to the "override sanity bot" button).
Although I can't ever remember having seen a -2 in those modules, so may
Tbf, the only vote that's needed is to make you the official maintainer.
The only reason this situation even exists is seemingly because while
Christian +2'd your patch, he didn't override -2 from Ossi while it was
said above he could. Regardless of who is right in this situation, that he
didn't li
I believe there were several other cases, both in gerrit and discord.
I think, we should proceed with a formal vote.
Ivan
> 16 сент. 2021 г., в 14:50, David Skoland написал(а):
>
>
>
>> On 15 Sep 2021, at 16:52, Oswald Buddenhagen
>> wrote:
>> your arrogance, dismissiveness, and cynicism a
Hi,
there are currently multiple issues on the dev branch. In any qtmodule that
transitively depends on qtdeclarative and in qtdeclarative itself changes will
fail to integrate. Neither can the precheck button be used.
This will be fixed once a submodule update of qtdeclarative adds a newer
q
On 15 Sep 2021, at 16:52, Oswald Buddenhagen
mailto:oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de>> wrote:
your arrogance, dismissiveness, and cynicism are duly noted, as usual.
I believe this constitutes a personal attack, which is in violation of the Qt
Code of Conduct:
http://quips-qt-io.herokuapp.com/quip-001
Hi Everyone!
We have released Qt 6.2.0 RC today. As earlier you can get it via the online
installer. Src packages are also available in the Qt Account and
download.qt.io. Delta to the beta4 attached.
The target is to release Qt 6.2.0 at the end of September so please inform us
immediately if y
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 09:34:00AM +, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> the thing is that an agreement *can* be reached, as has been many times
> before. the maintainer just doesn't give a shit.
Can we refrain from using such language on the mailing list? Not everyone
appreciates it and there is no
QUIP-2 clearly states that the maintainer has decision power in case no
agreement can be reached.
the thing is that an agreement *can* be reached, as has been many times
before. the maintainer just doesn't give a shit.
The question is more about how much effort and discussion is needed to
reac
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 07:52:14AM +, Lars Knoll wrote:
The original problem is that using a -2 to block a change that has been
approved by the module maintainer is basically abusing gerrit to break
our governance model.
telling the maintainer to not do a proper job as a maintainer is also
Hi,
I think this discussion about details is pretty much irrelevant.
The original problem is that using a -2 to block a change that has been
approved by the module maintainer is basically abusing gerrit to break our
governance model. QUIP-2 clearly states that the maintainer has decision power
12 matches
Mail list logo
